Maybe, making it as incorrect as possible serves to prove a point which makes statement phrased correctly for the goal in mind?
sukhmel
joined 2 years ago
Are they overdue to go extinct somehow?
Yeah, we better think of making some solid gold equipment for tennis
But he could've organised orgies to increase daily nudes views, optimisation
Like ‘hey, your baby is not covered, it's 43 minutes under due’
making January to most financially responsible time to have a medical emergency
Extremely well said, and an extremely sad thing to say, the system that makes you plan your medical emergencies is perfectly balanced, indeed
This is peak incompetence, I think, but it maybe shows that they see their mission not in preserving credible sources, but in breaking paywalls or something else entirely that is not forfeited by petty revenge edits
This is still my number one fear to hear about any archive, because altering the data when done properly may go undetected and lead people to wrong conclusions
This is why I usually enjoy the book more if I know some context about a writer, even if my conclusions about how it influenced a book are entirely wrong. I think it's better to know context for visual art, too, but indeed context is not a part of the artwork itself (although I believe not everyone thinks this way, and I don't know if I agree with them or not in the end)
I think maybe it's because almost any vapourwave scam has some legitimate use (NFT is definitely an exception, so maybe I'm totally wrong with other cases, too)
It was even licensed and translated for broadcast in other countries, but I concur that Lexx is a bit obscure one
Yeah, and that's possible even if they take it for a joke that it is (or isn't)
Ah, yeah, I thought it was if we go extinct, not if we never existed