sukhmel

joined 2 years ago
[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 4 points 2 months ago

But he could've organised orgies to increase daily nudes views, optimisation

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 4 points 2 months ago

Like ‘hey, your baby is not covered, it's 43 minutes under due’

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 5 points 2 months ago

making January to most financially responsible time to have a medical emergency

Extremely well said, and an extremely sad thing to say, the system that makes you plan your medical emergencies is perfectly balanced, indeed

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 29 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This is peak incompetence, I think, but it maybe shows that they see their mission not in preserving credible sources, but in breaking paywalls or something else entirely that is not forfeited by petty revenge edits

This is still my number one fear to hear about any archive, because altering the data when done properly may go undetected and lead people to wrong conclusions

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 3 points 2 months ago

This is why I usually enjoy the book more if I know some context about a writer, even if my conclusions about how it influenced a book are entirely wrong. I think it's better to know context for visual art, too, but indeed context is not a part of the artwork itself (although I believe not everyone thinks this way, and I don't know if I agree with them or not in the end)

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think maybe it's because almost any vapourwave scam has some legitimate use (NFT is definitely an exception, so maybe I'm totally wrong with other cases, too)

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It was even licensed and translated for broadcast in other countries, but I concur that Lexx is a bit obscure one

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 4 points 2 months ago

Yeah, and that's possible even if they take it for a joke that it is (or isn't)

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 4 points 2 months ago

Yeah, the thing also has limited scope and requires some meddling to point to necessary includes as evidenced by the first issue, afair. And the code produced is subpar I heard

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 4 points 2 months ago

I would've never understood that it's a label on the water if it weren't for your explanation. I second that it's conveyed rather suboptimally

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 1 points 2 months ago

They will be bailed in order to ‘compete with China in AI arms race’, imo

view more: ‹ prev next ›