sukhmel

joined 3 years ago
[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 3 points 3 months ago

Well, I'm still waiting for that new language everyone is talking about to mature enough for being really useful, it's not even 50 years old yet, that C++ lang

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 3 points 3 months ago

I think, it all stems from an idea that in a new field you can grab a niche and be a ~~monopoly~~ successful business if you move fast enough, and inherently implies nobody believes in fair competition

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 1 points 3 months ago

That we have to do that at all is a real scourge of our time, on par with trying to replace everyone with artificial idiots

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It used to be very hard to find an artist even if they have a distinct style, but your search terms are ‘Spanish artist with a lot of unsettling characters hiding the pain and smiling’ or something like that

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 3 points 3 months ago

Have you seen formats that use unpadded seconds, minutes and hours? 11:4:7 is just beautiful time formatting 🥹 /s

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 2 points 4 months ago

I don't think it was a question, really

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The one I responded to assumed he was missed on purpose, I don't argue he was not targeted, I argue it's practically impossible to miss him by so little on purpose and not make him die in the explosion at the same time

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Do you mean they should throw a lot of gold to fill in the gaps?

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 4 points 4 months ago (3 children)

If you mean missing an ant with a gun, then maybe. But it doesn't look deliberate, and the explosion could have killed them anyway

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 2 points 4 months ago

And the medicine is for common cold

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Mind you, I'm not arguing that was crappy, just that not any modification of links is bad

view more: ‹ prev next ›