sukhmel

OP should have mentioned that railings will be upgraded with anti tank obstacles that way irony would have been more apparent 😅

!(for real though, I was reading your comment first and even so almost missed OP's sarcasm)!<

I wouldn't say that it's a free market when there are so many mega corporations and their lobbies in government, but I agree with the rest

Ey tried to write it with ^ on both sides to indicate agreement to a comment right upwards, like this: ^yes^

But an unescaped circumflex makes the following upper script, so ^yes^ becomes ^yes^

Afaik, mostly for not being too efficient in a suboptimal environment. Also for having a limit on minimal size, but there has been an article somewhere, I'll update if I find it

Edit: haven't found the article, but what I found is this. They fly relatively low (under 2 km), have a hard time going against wind, old ones also had trouble landing. Also contemporary ones are more of a hybrid of dirigible, plane, and helicopter, that probably makes them expensive, too. Existing airship infrastructure is also not suitable for them

Edit2: oh, and some claim that dirigibles don't work for commerce because commerce is too conservative, but it's not too likely because there were news of dirigibles almost taking over the cargo transportation since like 1960s and it didn't yet, so likely there are things to be solved

I've played a different one and resisted spending cash. One day I felt depression getting worse over my addiction to that game and had given all of my accounts to other players and uninstalled everything. It felt kinda bad for a week or two but then got better. I'd say you still can win that

I had a couple of paperbacks back in the day, but they are still lying around where I used to live. The only book that I would still read now is about the Linux kernel, but it's not O'Reilly and it's about a deprecated kernel anyway XD

That's wild 🤯

other people to do the mental heavy lifting for you

Nah, no heavy lifting on me side

Biblical scholars aren't history scholars

I can't quite follow you beyond the fact that in your example "all A are not C" is correct

The cops used to find people growing marijuana in winter by the snow thawed on the roofs. Now there would be a mining rig under such a roof (also, most of the time there will be no snow, and then too much snow on occasion)

The market is run by people, and people have been proven not to be rational. So, sunk cost easily applies to the market