tee9000

joined 2 months ago
[–] tee9000@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No, not at all.

[–] tee9000@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Peoples personal truths dont need to make objective sense. This could literally be what they do. Its not trolling just because they arent posturing as an internet expert on life. This is the honesty we need. Doesnt mean we have to aspire to the same goal.

[–] tee9000@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

This needs to be an auto comment on every post in Lemmy.

[–] tee9000@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What does that mean?

[–] tee9000@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Oh wow can you tell me more?

[–] tee9000@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If it is indeed correct, indeed. Hopefully we all get equality in paradise in the end.

[–] tee9000@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

Im not a historian, nor revolutionist, and i have the benefit of just shitting on your assertions. But i am your target audience. And i still dont know how you are going to convince me to read a stack of history books or pick up an AK.

My self interest will probably just make me want to fight for the system as long as i can instead of enduring hardship. Anyways nice talking to you.

[–] tee9000@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (5 children)

I just want to say your effort is appreciated and fair points regarding what i dont know about marxism.

  1. I think my conjecture that the power structures wont be destroyed is justification enough to not seek to destroy them. My "seems like" is alternative to working with the power structure, but i understand i dont have data to substaniate my belief that individuals wont overcome centralized supercomputer data analytics commanding autonomous enforcement.

  2. I didnt say capitalism would be preserved, but that the current power structures would. I dont think there will be a compelling motivation for an impervious power structure to maintain the illusion of freedom. Profit falling off doesnt dissolve societal hierarchy if the power structure still enforces it by identity rather than wealth.

  3. Our discomfort doesnt have much time to motivate us before we willingly accept the power structure (due to no alternative).

That said, im not convinced an omnipresent evil is guaranteed to arise from capitalism, just a self-interested entity.

[–] tee9000@lemmy.world -1 points 3 days ago (9 children)

Im feeling a little ignored with that answer when im saying the power structures can be largely automated, and used by individuals, which certainly must be outside the comprehension of marxist teachings.

Additionally, while capitalism might end, we have no guarantee about its replacement. If any time in history could yield a unique power structure it would be now.

Seems more relevant to try to influence the power structure than to destroy it. I say that not because it currently cant be destroyed, but that it wont, and this only becomes more true as time goes on as capability of automated power structures increases. Our comfort is ample to keep the system safe.

[–] tee9000@lemmy.world -1 points 3 days ago (11 children)

Transparently, I wont, and thats part of the problem.

If you want to talk about overcoming increasingly capable power structures that are increasingly yielded by laymen individuals, and not highly trained groups, then id be interested to hear about it. But i understand if this is not how you want to spend your time.

 

Three Mile Island was the worst nuclear accident in US history. Was mainly caused by poor design of human feedback systems which caused operational confusion and lead to a catastrophic failure.

view more: next ›