thatcarolguy

Of course, the Ananda a feel fuller, airier and with more natural timber

There is no of course. It may sound fuller and airier, more natural to you or it may not.

There is nothing that says it has to and there is nothing that says a headphone of any price has to have anything more than an IEM of any price.

Personally I think the best $20 IEM I have ever heard sounds much better than the best headphones I've ever heard including several over $1000. It's not even close and it's not about the money.

They are very comfortable and easy to fit but walking with them is awful due to the thump. And also the 12k peak measured on the original with the new rig is real. I told y'all.

Yep, I have a playlist that is over 3 weeks long.

Also, I'm a simple man. I see Nickelback, I upvote.

no

It's gotta be written by a bot that knows nothing about what songs actually sound like or what a human would look for in songs for testing headphones.

There's a reason our society is greatly built upon visual stimuli. It is by far our most reliable and useful sense for making sense of reality.

k

Absolute clown move. You can't know anything about what makes IEMs sound the way they sound and what you truly prefer/need after 2 weeks. You just threw money at it to bask in the placebo.

Why do you want to "upgrade" if you already EQ it?

If you don't want to EQ then get whatever comes closest to MKIII + your favorite EQ.

Then get a Tanchjim DSP for 1/10th the price. When you buy a Dusk you are paying for the physical tuning.

Why bother with a DSP cable for such minor adjustments?

I can't stand the clunky feel, fit and controls of Space Travel after trying Galaxy buds.