theangriestbird

They can call it what they want to deflect scrutiny, but the fact is that it mirrors breeding mechanics from other games, like FF7's chocobo breeding. So calling it "breeding" as a joke is not really that wild or unusual.

I think you're laser-focusing on a weirdly specific thing, I think it's just a joke. Gita clearly enjoys the game, the subheader is just a funny elevator pitch for the game.

Did u read the article? Gita seems to be in love with the game, I wouldn't say they were shaming it at all!

awh that's wholesome

aha you give the actual real answer that most of us would probably give, if we only got to say one thing. Money kind of makes a lot of problems go away.

That makes sense actually. I'm guessing they have been sued for similar stuff in the past and as you said, the small revenue stream is not worth the cost in lawsuits.

can anyone speak to why payment processors care about AI porn at all? With the duopoly of PayPal and Stripe, I'm not totally clear why the payment processors think that AI Porn will impact their bottom line in the slightest. If people take issue with the payment processors' implicit approval of these practices, what are they gonna do? It's not like there are any viable alternatives.

Do we think this is because of anything other than the fact that last year was a presidential election year? The opinions of the masses are VERY malleable to messages of political campaigns. Less active campaigns = fewer strong opinions about wedge issues.

This must be Grok's ultimate mission, create an AI in Elon Musk's image so he can live on forever in the AI. It would totally track with his weird mission to pollute the planet with his progeny. His main goal in life seems to be legacy, having as many people as possible say "Elon Musk is cool" for as long as possible.

right? it was like the only thing that made me sort of okay with the lack of sales.

damn, good to know. strange for someone to post what they posted, defend biased sources, and then come here and complain about "corporate news outlets will never be trustworthy"?

i guess my point is that I understand why the researchers are doing it - the UN gave them money to research ways the UN could use AI, so that is what they did. It's not like the research is unethical in the sense that it directly harms participants. Maybe it's a dumb waste of money, but at that point, the question is more for the UN leaders that said "we should give someone money to research AI". And I don't know that 404 Media has the pull to interview those people.