theneverfox

I've got some. My friend at FEMA was literally on the phone with me when his boss called - this was the night before it made landfall, their biggest concern was the mountains in South Carolina, because they're entirely not equipped to deal with a storm like this

He was also pissed that Vermont pushed their paperwork through just before for incidents months ago, and they were all already swamped because of the end of the fiscal year, and the flurry of changes that come with the

So all in all, they knew exactly where would be hardest hit, acted preventively, and were on 24/7 call (which they don't get paid for, which is bullshit). Mainstream media (from what little I saw myself and my father passed on second hand) was worried about Georgia

They were zeroed in on the biggest disaster region, and acted days in advance. Those are the facts I saw.... I'll know more when my friend has time to chat

The body. It's feeding you vast amounts of information every moment, it's the one making decisions, you're the AI assistant providing analysis and advice

If you clone a tree, you get a similar tree. The branches aren't in the same place. If you clone a human, why would the nerves be laid out the same way? Even if it's wired up correctly, without a lifetime of cooperation why would your body take your advice?

Imagine you wake up. Red looks blue. Everything feels numb. The doctor says "everything looks good, why don't you try to stand up?". You want to cooperate with the doctor, but you don't stand up. You could move, but you don't. Rationalizing your choices, you tell the doctor you don't feel like it. You feel your toes, you shift to get away from the prodding of your doctor, but you just can't muster the will to stand

Imagine you wake up. Your sight is crystal clear, you feel your body like never before. The doctor says "don't move yet". With the self control of a child, you rip out the itchy IV to get the tape off of you. The doctor says something in a stem tone, and you're filled with rage. You pummel the doctor, then are filled with regret and start to cry

Emerging science suggests this kind of situation could lead to brand new forms of existential horror

Generative AI is definitely useful - it's mighty putty. It fills in gaps and sticks things together wonderfully. It let's you easily do things near impossible before

It's also best used sparingly

That's because we're using it wrong. It's not a genie you go to for answers to your problems, it's mighty putty. You could build a house out of it, but it's wildly expensive and not at all worth it. But if you want to stick a glass bottle to a tree, or fix a broken plastic shell back together, it's great

For example, you can have it do a web search, read through the results to see if it actually contains what you're looking for, then summarize what it found and let you jump right there to evaluate yourself. You could have it listen to your podcasts and tag them by topic. You could write a normal program to generate a name and traits of a game character, then have the AI write flavor text and dialog trees for quest chains

Those are some projects I've used AI for - specifically, local AI running on my old computer. I'm looking to build a new one

I also use chat gpt to write simple but tedious code on a weekly basis for my normal job - things like "build a class to represent this db object". I don't trust it to do anything that's not straightforward - I don't trust myself to do anything tedious

The AI is not an expert, I am. The AI is happy to do busy work, every second of it increases my stress level. AI is tireless, it can work while I sleep. AI is not efficient, but it's flexible. My code is efficient, but it is not flexible

As a part of a system, AI is the link between unstructured data and code, which needs structure. It let's you do things that would have required a 24/7 team of dozens of employees. It also is unable to replace a single human - just like a computer

That's my philosophy at least, after approaching LLMs as a new type of tool and studying them as a developer. Like anything else, I ran it on my own computer and poked and prodded it until I saw the patterns. I learned what it could do, and what it struggled to do. I learned how to use it, I developed methodologies. I learned how to detect and undo "rampancy", a number of different failure states where it degrades into nonsense. And I learned how to use it as another tool in my toolbox, and I pride myself on using the right tool for the job

This is a useful tool - I repeatedly have used it to do things I couldn't have done without it. This is a new tool - artisans don't know how to use it yet. I can build incredible things with this tool with what I know now, and other people are developing their own techniques to great effect. We will learn how to use this tool, even in its current state. It will take time, its use may not be obvious, but this is a very useful tool

Because Disney didn't own the restaurant, it was a private restaurant renting a building in a shopping center owned by Disney

Disney was just the landlord in this situation, and so they honestly had nothing to do with it

Oh, the metaphor goes further. We're not the pilot of the suit, we're not the hardware, we're not the OS of the suit, we're the AI assistant

We speak for it with the other AIs, we get called up to handle things we don't have learned behaviors for, we analyze and provide feedback - we give advice and it feels like we're making decisions, but we're not

Once again, the science piles up behind my "we're just LLMs running on the mecha suit controlled by bacteria" theory

That's not what I'm mad about. I'm mad that it won't ever work - Ubisoft isn't trying to figure out why their games are failing, they're trying to figure out how to keep the stock price projections up

Hence this article, which is signaling to wall Street "we're going to make layoffs and hire cheaper, less experienced people". They'll probably do it by closing studios and buying up new ones - that's pretty much their standard operating procedure. They buy up a studio, take their IP to add to the pile, then turn it into a formula and churn out games until the players lose interest in the IP

What's the problem? They're too damn big. What's the solution? Block them from acquiring more studios and they'll die without leaving a swath of destruction on the way down. Ideally split them up. Do the same with Microsoft and EA, and we could save the gaming industry overnight (granted, more like over the course of a few years)

Voting with your wallet doesn't work because to the leadership of a Corp, sales aren't what matters. Stock price matters, which is only tentatively linked to how profitable the company is, which is only tentatively linked to the quality of their products

It undoubtedly burned out hundreds of game devs who wasted years of their work and improved nothing about the industry

Mission accomplished?

Well I wouldn't say it's important, because it doesn't change anything

I would definitely say it's a waste of money to buy their bad games. They deserve to fail. I'm not happy about it, because I want good games, not for IP to be stretched so far I no longer care about it

But it's important to understand that AAA gaming is an oligopoly and not buying their games won't change that. It will not improve gaming. Ubisoft will close another dozen studios, buy 13 more, and learn all the wrong lessons (see current situation)

"Voting with your wallet" does not give you any control, just like recycling does not save the planet. It's a myth to redirect our attention

Structural problems can only be solved structurally.

They just ascribe a different metric as to why it failed

Yeah... That's my point. They will never say "our game failed because it was overly formulaic, unpolished, and our customers are getting sick of our bullshit"

It doesn't fit on the spreadsheet. They will never come to the correct conclusion. They structurally cannot

Oh, and you've never been a total and complete hypocrite with global consequences before?