theoretiker

joined 5 months ago
[–] theoretiker@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Ah that's really cool. So maybe similar to how turbulence can form at one point while the preceding flow remains laminar?

[–] theoretiker@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

But you didn't choose to have the thought did you?

Quick think of a city and then explain to me why you didn't pick Cairo

[–] theoretiker@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

I want to rebuke you but you name is even more triggering. There is no linear chaos, you need non-linearities or discontinuities for chaos.

[–] theoretiker@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Not executing it would also be predetermined. The only thing you can do is pretend to choose.

[–] theoretiker@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] theoretiker@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

What a stupid piece. You don't need anything quantum to recognize optical illusions. An optical illusion as they talk about it means that an image could be recognized as two things. This can be done by just adding some noise to the image. Sometimes it gets recognized as one thing and sometimes like another, just like humans would.

[–] theoretiker@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 months ago

It's meant to be said in a sarcastic tone

[–] theoretiker@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 3 months ago

Sounds like you need to give Google more private information