As an early career scientist, the poaching is only for leading scientists. So even with that a lot of people in US have to leave science, which was already bad because scientists made like half the salary of same expertise in an industry position.
thevoidzero
I witnessed an interaction where a grad school professor used AI detector and threatened to fail a student for submitting "AI generated" paper. It was so stupid, even after showing them how if you just add a few spelling mistakes the detection says human written, or even putting their own email in AI detector to show an example. It's like the saying "little knowledge is dangerous"
It's also easy for real life. They don't have to produce different parts or maintain them, or update them. All of that is just changing software and what it displays, that makes it easier for them to develop.
But as we're realizing it, it's harder to use and less safe.
I want to join, but they don't let me
There are different fields of science. In my field (water resources), any scientist that is reasonable knows the climate change is happening, you can see it in any data that spans for last 50 years. We're focused on how to deal with it, given it'll get worse. All the future scenarios (from simulations) are worse than history, there's less worse and more worse depending on how people will act. But I think even the worst case did not have "world war" into consideration. So we might have wayy worse than our predictions. But again, predicting future is hard, there could be effects that we're not expecting. Specially the current geopolitical scenario when climate change (and greed) is making life hard leading into authoritative regimes which is making it worse on top of previous policies. Which exceeds the linear growth pattern used in the simulations.
Like, I don't think a lot of simulation took into account "what if we get rid of all the environmental protection policies?", maybe a little because they are looking at a lot of different scenarios, but not to this degree, because we didn't expect this to happen 10 years ago.
This is one of the things I don't understand about west, Grandparents and family are a big part of raising children in Asia. Anyone with their first baby will be confused, and won't know what to do if they have never done it before.
How it works in Asia (at least my culture),
- Grandparents teach and take care of baby, letting the mother rest and breastfeed. They have seen and gone through multiple baby raising themselves,
- other siblings help, even younger siblings, that means when it's their turn they also have some idea and experience on the matter,
- you also help with cousins and other people occasionally, so even the eldest children have some experience with babies,
- many communities have volunteers that help with new moms on new suggestions from government. Like when we changed from carrying baby on the back, to carrying them in the front for warmth and safety. So this balances tradition with new knowledge on what is best.
This is the knowledge transfer part. There is the whole part where this support means a lot for recovering mothers.
Watch frieren
Considering they just hold back packages, but do not do additional testing to release them, yeah, they should not do that.
Arch already has testing repo, normal repo packages on arch are already stable enough
Also, AI can talk and listen, so what's to say radio won't have the same problem if enough people start using it
Perfectly reasonable for you to ask that.
Even with IUD you can get pregnant. And yes STDs and things, if you were in a long term relationship then it's probably fine, but if you're hooking up for the first time and they're fussy about it, then yeah, they're not good.
It was in my school.
People that gamble are mostly the students that didn't pay attention in class anyway.
Smart people only 'gamble' when the rules benefits them.
Did it hear from the Vatican that capybara is a fish?