treefrog

joined 1 year ago
[–] treefrog@lemm.ee 1 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

The reason I mentioned it is because the efficacy isn't there especially with stuff like CPTSD and PTSD. So, you give a patient an antidepressant and you diagnose them with depression so the insurance will pay for it, when the underlying cause is actually childhood trauma and then they get a false hope that the depression medication is going to fix them. And they get misdiagnosed in the process.

All of this is problematic for a number of reasons. And of course if the medication doesn't work the doctor will just say well let's try a different SSRI because often we need to go through three or four of them before we find something that works.

What works best for CPTSD is trauma-informed therapy. Thankfully the medical community seems to be getting wiser. And listening to patients better, at least around here.

[–] treefrog@lemm.ee 2 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

Withdrawal and discontinuation syndrome are synonyms. The later term was coined by the pharmaceutical industry in order to distance SSRIs from opioids in the minds of doctors and patients.

You can taper off of heroin and you can taper off of an SSRI but if you stop either cold turkey, you are going into withdrawal.

The common word for a substance that does this is that it is addictive. When a person says heroin is addictive they are referring to the fact that it produces physical withdrawal when you stop it.

Heroin is also habit forming, SSRIs are not habit forming as they do not create psychological reinforcement through dopamine pathways. So, they do not create a psychological addiction or habit, but they remain physically addictive and your body will still suffer from withdrawal when you quit.

When someone quits coffee we say they have caffeine withdrawals. When someone quits SSRIs we say they have discontinuation syndrome?

It's corporate marketing meant to minimize risks in the minds of doctors and patients. We already had a word for it.

Hence, there's a lot of informed consent issues with psychiatric medication in general but especially SSRIs.

[–] treefrog@lemm.ee 0 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (9 children)

I don't have any issues with the drugs themselves. That said, there's serious consent issues around these medications, at least in the U.S.

Such as being overprescribed for conditions that they don't treat well (CPTSD and PTSD for instance), having the positive effects overstated (they're okay for mild to moderate depression, and not great for off label uses such as those just mentioned), and having the side effects downplayed (addictive is addictive, we don't need new words like discontinuation syndrome, when withdrawal communicates clearly). SSRIs aren't even the worst offenders on the market when it comes to this. SNRIs often have a very short half life, and a single missed dose can cause crippling withdrawal.

But how many of us have been prescribed these off label? With no indication of their addictive nature and potential withdrawal, not to mention sexual dysfunction? And for conditions that they don't treat well to begin with? That's not informed consent.

[–] treefrog@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago

Lying and cheating is wrong but the anti-choice crowd literally believes Democrats are baby killers so, I put my money on willful ignorance.

[–] treefrog@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago

Narcissism?

[–] treefrog@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Here's a post demonstrating how mainstream tech media is complicit.

https://lemm.ee/post/45092755

[–] treefrog@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Gold? I don't think any life uses it for sustenance outside of technological and sociological applications.

[–] treefrog@lemm.ee -4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And thanks for using the correct gender I appreciate it.

[–] treefrog@lemm.ee -5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

What democracy? It's fascism or fascism light. I'm voting for Kamala because I'm practical. But let's not pretend this is about democracy. Because the choice is a false one.

This country is run by money and privilege. Not our votes.

[–] treefrog@lemm.ee -4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Because you all have a hate hard on?

Like how much do you all hate this person that you downvote them being polite after I correct them misgendering me?

If you don't like somebody's politics down vote the politics but don't hate on the person.

[–] treefrog@lemm.ee -4 points 1 month ago

People even down voting you for being polite.

view more: ‹ prev next ›