No. Stony.
troed
"Turing test" for music successfully passed, then.
Brought to you by (us) security researchers who will happily come in and sort out your security issues later. For a very hefty hourly fee.
So? Pubkey login only and fail2ban to take care of resource abuse.
There are a lot of hero programmers involved in enabling people in Ukraine to defend themselves.
Volkswagen is doing really well. No idea why the headline would point out Chinese EVs specifically.
/switched to VW ID.7 from Tesla Model 3
... so, again, absolutely nothing supporting data whatsoever behind your claims.
I agree you're pretty done ;)
You have posted absolutely nothing on "insurance data and rates". You have no idea what that would even look like to support your claim.
Let's revisit: Your claim is that whenever there's a story about autopilot/FSD having caused an accident it's actually the person driving that caused it.
Now support your claim with something tangible besides your own gut feeling and "common sense".
So your supporting data for your claim is "common sense"?
I think Xitter is more your arena tbh.
Warning: Science follows.
The problem with all of these comparions between ice cores and modern CO2 measurements is that we assume the CO2 trapped in the ice doesn't migrate over time. If that were to happen, we would measure smoothened values over some period of time.
This paper claims that this is exactly what happens: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-glaciology/article/co2-diffusion-in-polar-ice-observations-from-naturally-formed-co2-spikes-in-the-siple-dome-antarctica-ice-core/8C8638D9EC90AEA53B90B3DE70E594C0
Yeah that claim you make about it being the driver and not FSD "almost every time" exists only in your imagination.
Do the IPCC, representing the scientific consensus, agree?