ultrahamster64

joined 1 year ago
[โ€“] ultrahamster64@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Can you explain the last part (about solarpunk) what fatalism do you mean and what goal did they fail? And who are "they"?

[โ€“] ultrahamster64@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You can get space cadet on arch?? (also: looks really good!)

[โ€“] ultrahamster64@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Yes, thank you for correcting. I was in the zone when writing and exaggerated a bit :)

Although I should note that it still is a really long time!!

[โ€“] ultrahamster64@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Sorry for yapping, but this is a very perplexing problem that even we as a collective civilization struggle with. For example: how do you keep future generations out of nuclear waste vaults on a 1000/2000/1`000'000 year scale (we don't even talk about infinity, because it is surprise infinite times larger), because we cannot predict how even our language and (more than that) our culture would look like. One text/symbol/pictogram could tell something completely different to a person 10000 years in the future, than to a current-day one.

For me, the most interesting part was the conclusion: instead of using static language or pictograms printed on the walls (although some menacing skulls wouldn't hurt) they instead opted out to a more dynamic and "updatable" forms of media - myths and legends (and maybe also a church, but I don't remember). And that is not as ridiculous as it sounds - some of the myths from the past that we can read, like, right now, were created more than a couple thousand years ago (some even more than 10000). Also, an obvious note, but they weren't created in a modern language. So this means that everything around them basically died/changed: the author, many many many of the ones who retold them, their first written forms, the printing company that first printed them, even the language (basically, transmission protocol) on which it was created is dead.

So (if we get back to the original scope of the question) that means that you basically have two choices:

  1. Make your web site out of stone and hide it somewhere around Antarctica.

"+":

  • the decay would be greatly slow down
  • no one is going to (or, could) delete/destroy it

"-":

  • no one is probably going to see it for a looong time (and when the do, they might not understand a thing)
  1. Not be silly.

The thought of everything that you do/have/see breaking to dust is equally scary and relaxing - but it is true. No matter how much you paid for your domain name, or how your server is getting power out of solar, self-backups and self-repairs - everything eventually would break, catch fire, explode and turn off.

Or rather it will, without someone maintaining it. Because the only man-made things that live forever are doing so on the power of human resilience and preservation. It's like this ancient art of a horse on some hill in the UK, that would be erased by the tides of history a loong time ago, but is still here because a couple of english mates have a bucket of white paint and some free time on tuesday.

So if you think about how this site that you poured your heart and soul into would instantly vanish as soon as you're dead, remember: as long as someone cares and loves what you do (and with some coordination), the thing that you made would transcend the boundaries of some hostings, domains and internet protocols (and maybe even the language itself) and live in the minds of people, truly, forever.

[โ€“] ultrahamster64@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Yeah looks nice :) Link to background, pls

[โ€“] ultrahamster64@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

People who think like this, miss two important points in my opinion:

  1. If you have a dogshit diet it's not going to be a "happy life full of tasty food" it's going to be an absolytely miserable existence, filled to the brim with stomach problems, skin problems, awful sleep schedule, variety of diseases and feeling bad in general

  2. You don't need a nutrient paste to eat healthy - you just need a balanced dier. That means that shouldn't eat absolute garbage and not "overconsume" anything. Eat veggies, dairy, treat yourself to meat once in a while and you golden. The only actually hard thing it requires is some work - you need to actively seek recipes, spend some time at the store to find good products or even spend some time to find a good local shop that actually sells food and some processed garbage from supermarket, and eat mostly cooked at home stuff.

But for me personally it is worth it. I would much rather eat some backed veggies with a glass of milk and tasty fruits for a dessert in the evening, than go to a dirty cramped place and eat shitty cardboard-like dog food that they serve at McDs

[โ€“] ultrahamster64@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

What? No... Where you even get that idea

[โ€“] ultrahamster64@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

What do you mean "cultural differences between smiling even in modern day Russia"?

Agreed. You don't need to make it a "to the end of life" thing. Go there for a year, look at how it influence your headspace, have a change of pace from industrial environment.

Thanks, I'll try it

 

I always been kinda interested and even fascinated by decentralized currency, thought that it was a cool idea, and then seen how it was absolutely mauled by scams, money laundering and predatory practices in general to the point when even thinking about it was gross. And I kinda forgot about it for a while.

But recently there appeared a need for me to actually use cryptocurrency (I want to pay for vds where I host my proxy, without linking my credit card), so I started researching what exist now on the market of wallets, and was rather disappointed: most surface level projects are in-browser always online with "super slick ultra cool design" bullshit with the focus on trading. So, I thought about asking more experienced people (that are not some random cryptobros). Here are my requirements:

  • must store all the sensetive data localy on a device as much as possible
  • must be open-source
  • must have desktop app as main (if it has a complimentary mobile app that's fine, but the central point of operation must be desktop app)
  • ideally supports all main stable-coins
  • ideally doesn't have pretentious trading crap, nft shit etc.
  • ideally have a non-bullshit, straight to the point interface (along the lines of monero wallet I guess)

Also, I think I need to mention that I'm somewhat techsavy, but I'm not super experienced with cryptocurrency, so I'm open to learning things about it. Maybe some of my points are impossible due to how technology works, but I hope I got the "vector" of my wishes across.

P.S. Sorry for such a long post and thank you if you set aside the time to read it and respond.

view more: next โ€บ