unoriginalsin

joined 1 year ago
[–] unoriginalsin@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

The problem is a constant fight against gravity. You've still got to pump the water effectively to the top of the building every day. And there's still the issue of getting sunlight to the plants.

The question really becomes whether it's more economical to just use traditional irrigation techniques upstream and ship the produce in vs converting a skyscraper into a very inefficient farm space.

[–] unoriginalsin@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Early Access karma whoring.

[–] unoriginalsin@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago
[–] unoriginalsin@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

So what you're telling me is, people do want to work? Who knew?

[–] unoriginalsin@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Humana last weeks without food, you think you're going to starvea 7 ton, cold blooded carrion eater to death in a mere month?

[–] unoriginalsin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

cries in HL3

[–] unoriginalsin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

"Do you have any feelings whatsoever about the way automobile taillights work in the US?"

"No, why would I?."

"After you watch this video, you're going to write your congressman."

[–] unoriginalsin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I'm not a troll. You're a hypocrite.

[–] unoriginalsin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

But if your oppressor is LGBTQ+ and oppressing you for being LGBTQ+ it is "rules for thee..."

Yes. He is "rules for thee..."ing you.

But when you out him you become the one not abiding by your own rules. Twice. Once for the outing, because you don't want to be outed. And again for not holding yourself to your own standard of not having rules that don't apply to you.

I don't think we should be defending the rights of an oppressor over the rights of the oppressed.

If you think that some people don't deserve to have their rights protected, then you are the oppressor.

[–] unoriginalsin@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I cannot decipher your actual stance.

I can't fathom why, when I've stated it multiple times in the clearest possibly English.

Don't out anyone. No exceptions.

If you make exceptions then it's you who is creating "rules for thee..."

[–] unoriginalsin@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

That is actually a different thing. And I agree, but you still shouldn't be outing them.

[–] unoriginalsin@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (8 children)

It's called none of your business. You can't expect someone to adhere to a standard you refuse to recognize. It's classic, "Rules for thee..."

view more: next ›