untorquer

joined 3 months ago
[–] untorquer@quokk.au 3 points 1 day ago

Windows is already occupying your hardware and network with "telemetry". I would be surprised if telemetry overhead alone was all that was needed to burden modern hardware and yet when i boot into windows those fans never shut up.

[–] untorquer@quokk.au -3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Being on the receiving end of crowd control munitions is certainly a better education then any book.

If you're curious about theory there's tons of alternatives to books: podcasts, film, public speeches, community training/workshops, etc.

My suggestion is Women's War by Robert Evans on Behind the Bastards. I also suggest pretty much anything on https://channelzeronetwork.com/

If someone just shows up and participates with an open mind they're doing more than most. Anyone who would gatekeep because you didn't read such and such text should be promptly told to fuck right off because that's a caustic hierarchical bullshit appeal to false authority and kills engagement.

If you need a (text)book try The Ecology of Freedom - Bookchin. You could probably find other books here too https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/murray-bookchin-the-ecology-of-freedom

[–] untorquer@quokk.au 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Oh no! Not an extra hundred milliseconds to post!

[–] untorquer@quokk.au 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Separate hard drives one for windows and one for Linux+GRUB then grub just needs to be told where the windows boot loader is and BIOS should load GRUB default.

OP post happens when you attempt to just use partitions. It can work per other comment, just more fragile.

[–] untorquer@quokk.au 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

I wonder if it changed much in the last year. The assembly implementation is what's holding me back. Well, that and staring at cad all day at work already.

[–] untorquer@quokk.au 2 points 3 days ago

Well don't complain to me when you fall off trying to walk on some ball. i tried to warn you. 🤷 Roundies smh...

[–] untorquer@quokk.au -2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Not sure where i decided the narrator is unreliable. They say their partner loves it. Two people happy in a relationship. An example of how one problem solved to meet the needs communicated by the other. The result being positive. That's just reading what's written. I don't see where i made something up. I provided examples of types of people who may use a logic like this but didn't prescribed it to op.

Not a dynamic for me but i wouldn't gawk at someone for feeling fulfilled in it. I get the humor that it's expected to be considered demeaning.

🤷

[–] untorquer@quokk.au 83 points 3 days ago (4 children)

They might get a few scratches from those flimsy flexible plastics but it's not dangerous.

They'll definitely compassion about the possibility for scratches screaming, "that could damage my property!" though.

[–] untorquer@quokk.au -1 points 3 days ago

But you can't see anything past the horizon. Occam's razor suggests there's nothing beyond it

[–] untorquer@quokk.au 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

DDG performance has dropped for me. I use a mix of their app and Firefox loaded with a searxng.

https://paulgo.io/

Works like old Google, No ads, tends to reduce SEO sloop that DDG is susceptible to.

[–] untorquer@quokk.au 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

Unhealthy would be if you as the other in the relationship (the one seeking affection here) were not ok with this and tried to change it. It Doesn't sound like the relationship with the dog is negotiable.

I wouldn't be happy in that relationship because i need emotional mutuality/reflection, which is clearly muted here. But the two partners here are obviously fine with it.

I don't mean to diagnose anyone but this is fairly common for both trauma survivors and neurodivergence. Animals are just going to always be safer than people for some folks, and those folk also deserve love.

view more: next ›