Well, yes, but also - you don't have to pay them. There are open-weights models you can run locally that contain most of that common-wealth knowledge.
verstra
Well, these are some kind of lightweight container, no? But without isolating network, or /etc, /proc, /usr, /var or dbus.
I do agree that linux needs a notion of an "app" (isolated, with access only to its config and files you give it, and a small, well-designed set of APIs for interacting with the system). For coding agents, I think a better answer are development containers, because that would be needed to prevent npm/cargo/python build scripts from causing harm anyway.
It's probably something like "I've disabled agent's removeFile tool, but LLM figured out that it can use the bash tool, still".
It looks like "AI bad" or "Claude insecure" mantra.
This looks awesome
Think of them as operating on the whole column at once.
For example LAG would be like selecting a whole column in excel and copy pasting it one row down
No, I've removed the indentation of the first ul
Too much list indentation. Cool glow effect
It would, but it does not have SATA. You can find much cheaper computers that do have it
For a server like this 4GB of DDR4 is enough. And that is cheap still.
Linux really is the reason I dont' play anymore. Thank you linux.

I say mantra because there is a large amount of people just hating AI outright, without a grounded reasoning.
Granted, coding agents are insecure by default - they are built to execute remote code - but that does not mean they are generally useless/harmful/bad. I run them in a container, with access to the codebase only.
Also, they hallucinate, produce over-convoluted abstractions, do not know when to reject instead of blindly trying to find a way trough a brick wall.
But also, they can answer questions about gigantic codebases way faster than I could. They can generate tests, find missing test coverage, review code, and many other things.