walrusintraining

joined 1 year ago
[–] walrusintraining@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Just updated my firmware thanks!

[–] walrusintraining@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

Why do they think I got one in the first place?

[–] walrusintraining@lemmy.world 20 points 11 months ago (1 children)

How is this news? Some random US official suggested something??? Yall gotta stop with this bullshit.

[–] walrusintraining@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That seems a little overkill, especially since it’s a feature I doubt very many people would use. Just having it separate for each account would be sufficient, require less processing power and battery, and less time to code.

[–] walrusintraining@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (6 children)

They could add an imperceptible audio watermark

[–] walrusintraining@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They should fine them at least a billion then

It can be changed. If it had no/higher limit, the slider would move in greater increments, so less fine control.

 

Red line is default, and the blue line is # of votes multiplied by 1000. x is rank, y is time. z = number of votes and has a slider to change the value.

[–] walrusintraining@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There are a lot more countries than yours, believe it or not, and some of them don’t have the same justice system as yours. Do people in your country have the right to vote? Same sentiment, do you think that’s a stupid system?

[–] walrusintraining@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don’t think most people think ai is sentient. In my experience the people that think that are the ones who think they’re the most educated saying stuff like “neural networks are basically the same as a human brain.”

The issue with this is I also want to be able to see smaller posts that are gaining traction. I wouldn’t mind posts with 2 or 3 upvotes (votes from users other than the poster), but new posts with no upvotes should not be considered hot, and especially not posts with negative points.

 

Why is the lemmy hot sort seemingly so bad? After the first couple of posts it turns into new posts with no votes, sometimes the same new post multiple times back to back to different communities, and sometimes posts with negative points. I came across a series of posts today with 1 upvote (poster) and 6 downvotes. I don’t get how that can be considered “hot”

[–] walrusintraining@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Are you familiar with juries?

[–] walrusintraining@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah sure “guns don’t kill people, people kill people” is an outrageous take.

view more: next ›