News

It doesn't go into all servicemen because the authors are looking specifically at violence that women in the army experience.

This is incredibly dismissive. Women face a disproportionate amount of violence by the hands of their fellow servicemen. It's ok for us to talk about that without saying "what about men???!?"

A first-of-its-kind analysis by The Intercept found that in the Army, women are more likely to be killed by their fellow service members than by enemy combatants, in a reversal of the threat soldiers are trained to face. Between 2011 and August 2025, at least 41 women died by homicide in the Army — more than half of them at the hands of other service members or veterans. Using Defense Department manpower data to calculate per capita death rates, The Intercept found that active-duty Army women face a higher risk of homicide than male soldiers, the opposite of national and global trends.

It's like you didn't even read the article:

Analyzing over 14 years of Defense Department death data obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request, The Intercept’s investigation is the first to compare rates of violence against women in the Army to factors like duty location, jobs, and relationships with perpetrators. The FOIA data also reveals deaths not previously announced by the Army and the Department of Defense.

Violence against women in the military also appears to take a mental toll. In addition to the 41 women who died by homicide, another 128 died by suicide, the majority of them lower-ranking enlisted soldiers. From 2011 to 2024, the last complete year of data, homicide and suicide rates for women in the Army were double their equivalents for women nationwide.

The Army doesn’t make any of this public, and the Intercept’s investigation has found flaws in what data collection currently occurs: Homicide and suicide death rates are not separated by gender or calculated per capita, preventing deeper analysis and comparison.

From 2001 to 2023, nearly 1 in 4 women service members experienced sexual assault, according to the Brown University’s Costs of War project, much higher than the numbers annually reported by the Pentagon. Research identifies those experiences as a key driver of suicide risk. Over the past two decades, suicide rates among women veterans have risen faster than among men.

Another important piece of information that you decided to ignore.

AND THIS ONE:

While Hegseth rolls back protections, the issue of violence against women in the military appears to be getting worse. The Intercept’s analysis shows that from 2011 to 2020, the per capita rate of women dying by suicide or homicide in the Army was 15 per 100,000. From 2021 to 2024, following the Army’s attempted reforms in the wake of Vanessa Guillén’s killing, the rate increased over 35 percent, to 21 per 100,000.

And deaths continued their pace in 2025.

I just want to emphasize that that's still a massive problem if true because your comment could be interpreted as minimizing the situation. It's shameful how we treat our service men and women during and after their service.

In addition, women are much less likely to be in jobs that involve fighting on the front lines where being shot by an enemy is likely.

I remember back in one of the Gulf wars they released some statistics about members of the armed forces being killed, and a significant number were killed just loading and unloading equipment that was being shipped to the middle east before the war even started. These days you're very unlikely to be killed by an enemy, but the military still involves some high-risk jobs like construction work, welding, aircraft pilots and engineers, iron and steel workers, etc.

Also, keep in mind, these numbers are extremely low. They counted 41 over 14 years, so an average of 3 per year out of around 230,000 total women in the armed forces (military demographics PDF).

The article says, in addition "homicide and suicide rates for women in the Army were double their equivalents for women nationwide". I wonder how much of that is simply due to the ages of the people involved. 45% of members of the armed forces are under 25. Homicide rates are much higher for people around 25 than older people. It may be that if you pick any job where you mostly get younger people: cashiers, waiters, retail sales, etc. you get a much higher suicide / homicide rate than the national average.

I'm not saying there isn't a problem. I'd imagine a mostly male workplace is very likely to have more problems than one with an even mix of genders. I wouldn't be surprised if weapons availability and training led to more incidents than average. And, if you're teaching people to kill, it shouldn't be surprised if they kill. On the other hand, most jobs don't involve the kind of supervision you get in the military. And, most employers aren't as obsessed with procedures, discipline, etc. as the military. So, it might be that despite all those things, it remains safer for female workers than say being a woman on a construction site.

Women in combat positions is newer than the vietnam war. The headline should present it the other way around.

Is it not the same for men?