this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2026
391 points (98.8% liked)

People Twitter

10146 readers
803 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
SendMeYourTaTas@sh.itjust.works
pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
391
Statisticians, is this true? (infosec.pub)
submitted 1 day ago by cm0002@infosec.pub to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works
48 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (3 children)

I don't think I will ever figure out the order to read these things.

Just... Why? Wouldn't you want it to be formatted in a way that's immediately obvious what order to read them?

[–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 2 points 19 minutes ago* (last edited 18 minutes ago)

I used bluesky lately (which i guess uses the same format?) and it looks like so because we are viewing a reply(3) to a post (2) that cite another post (1)

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 5 minutes ago

Genuine question: what's confusing about this post?

There are some that are confusingly structured, but this one should be quite obvious

[–] vala@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Same