this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2026
39 points (75.3% liked)

Technology

7027 readers
700 users here now

News community around technology, social media platforms, information technology and governmental policy surrounding it.

What doesn't fit here?

The core of the story has to be technology focused.


Post guidelines

Title formatPost title should mirror the news source title. If you don't like the title of article, look for an alternative source instead of editorializing it.
URL formatPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title. Opinion articles refer to articles that their publisher doesn't explictly endorse.
Country prefixCountry prefix can be added to the title with a separator (|, :, etc.) if the news is from a local publisher who doesn't clearly mention the country.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sylver_dragon@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I'd love to have a robot to handle basic home maintenance tasks. Somehow, I'm not quite willing to bet $20k and $500/month on this thing being anything more than a gimmick. I'd also be really curious what happens to my $20k robot if I cancel the subscription and/or the company goes under. Do I just end up with a really expensive object lesson is poor spending decisions?

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

wait. wait. wait. theres a monthly fee as well?

[–] sylver_dragon@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

What, you expect to actually own something that costs you $20k? Quit obstructing their access to your bank account. Think of the shareholders!

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I know this is a little off from your reply but seriously there are so many things that fight me for me to send them money to pay for it rather than they sucking the money from me. its like no. just no.

[–] sylver_dragon@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

They want you to set up autopay so that you forget about it and just keep paying them forever. Similar reason that every online store wants to save your credit card info. The less friction you have to paying for something, the more likely you are to do it.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 1 points 5 hours ago

yeah its crazy. they want to keep your credit card and then they want to have your bank account info. its like eff off. It really annoys me because the whole bill pay thing from banks could be made much better but I feel every place is desperate to not work with it.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Pretty much. There's basically zero chance this will not end up on the pile of products released way before they reached commercial viability.

[–] sylver_dragon@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

Move fast and break things.

And by "things" they mean "functionality".

I'd also bet on "security" being one of those things. I can't wait to hear about the first time some kids from 4chan take control of one of these bots.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 4 points 13 hours ago

I mean they demoed this thing not that long ago and it was a disaster. So yeah, my expectations are low.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 0 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

I mean, it's 2026. I can't imagine the robot can't be jailbroken.

[–] LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz 0 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Sure, but without the giant data center running it, the robot won't be able to do anything.

$20k is probably decent for the amount of hardware you get, but the software is what would make this actually useful. And it's a long bet on if they can make it work.

Of course I wouldn't bring anything like this into my home that connects to a remote data center, it would have to be 100% locally run.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 hours ago

$20k is probably decent for the amount of hardware you get

That's my thought process. If the hardware is solid, software can be addressed later.

[–] dandi8@fedia.io 6 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Who's gonna hire an Indian to teleoperate it, then?

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Just buy a VR headset and become the Indian. By the time the company goes under, you can probably get an AI good enough to handle 80% of tasks and you can just patch in on critical steps for tricky stuff.

[–] dandi8@fedia.io 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

If I'm teleoperating it myself, I may as well do the chores myself.

I'm also dubious of the claim that AI will get "good enough" in the few years (at best) it takes the company to fold.

[–] Pappabosley@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

To an extent, except it's less exertion.

More realistically, that could actually be a good option for people who are physically incapable of the chore, but want to do it.