“Our company is cooler than X because we put a ‘1’ in front of it.”
this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2026
29 points (71.6% liked)
Technology
7027 readers
452 users here now
News community around technology, social media platforms, information technology and governmental policy surrounding it.
What doesn't fit here?
The core of the story has to be technology focused.
- If article mentions "AI" in a sentence and then talks about business economics that doesn't make it tech news.
- Gaming is too many layers removed from technology. There are many dedicated communities that are a better fit for it.
- Transporation is too many layers removed from technology. EVs while use many cool technologies have many dedicated communities that are a better fit for it.
- Entertainment is too many layers removed from technology. While sometimes it can fit here, business or cultural aspects of it are a better fit for dedicated communities.
- Cybersecurity. While it heavily focuses on technology, most of the time it's too technical for most people who are not already invested in it. Should be posted in a dedicated communities unless it has broader connection to other tech areas.
Post guidelines
Title format
Post title should mirror the news source title. If you don't like the title of article, look for an alternative source instead of editorializing it.
URL format
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefix
Opinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title. Opinion articles refer to articles that their publisher doesn't explictly endorse.
Country prefix
Country prefix can be added to the title with a separator (|, :, etc.) if the news is from a local publisher who doesn't clearly mention the country.
Rules
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original link
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communication
All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. Inclusivity
Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacks
Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangents
Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may apply
If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.
Companion communities
!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip
Icon attribution | Banner attribution
If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Bullshit
Nah, not bullshit. Just doesn't do them without remote human control. That falls under "features to he introduced at a later date."
planned $499 per month subscription
lol
taking bets on how long it will take for this to become abandonware
Quick...
I saw a story a while ago about a tech company renting out airbnbs as training environments for these types of bots
They absolutely destroyed the houses, fine motor skills is insanely difficult, and the robots just kept breaking everything.
The coders don't understand how the human brain works (no one does really, but they're especially ignorant). So they're trying to to make one "thing" that controls everything instead of a bunch of subprocesses acting along guidance
I bet it never even makes it to market. Now robots will for sure, but these first ones out of the gate types rarely make it.
But can you fuck it?
Asking for a friend.
I'm the friend.
I'd love to have a robot to handle basic home maintenance tasks. Somehow, I'm not quite willing to bet $20k and $500/month on this thing being anything more than a gimmick. I'd also be really curious what happens to my $20k robot if I cancel the subscription and/or the company goes under. Do I just end up with a really expensive object lesson is poor spending decisions?
I mean they demoed this thing not that long ago and it was a disaster. So yeah, my expectations are low.
I mean, it's 2026. I can't imagine the robot can't be jailbroken.
Who's gonna hire an Indian to teleoperate it, then?
Just buy a VR headset and become the Indian. By the time the company goes under, you can probably get an AI good enough to handle 80% of tasks and you can just patch in on critical steps for tricky stuff.
If I'm teleoperating it myself, I may as well do the chores myself.
I'm also dubious of the claim that AI will get "good enough" in the few years (at best) it takes the company to fold.
To an extent, except it's less exertion.
More realistically, that could actually be a good option for people who are physically incapable of the chore, but want to do it.
Why do they keep insisting on humanoid? Just give me the crushinator to do chores for $10,000.
Because a humanoid robot can theoretically do all the things humans can do, using appliances designed for humans to operate.
Non-humanoids can theoretically do that too.
"Non-humanoids" is an incredibly broad description. For example, a Roomba can't empty your dishwasher. But a humanoid robot can use your existing human vacuum to clean the floors.
Yes that's the whole point. They're forcibly thinking in humanoid forms, while I dont care about form, I care about function. Make shit that's useful, and I dont care what package it comes in. In the vast majority of use cases it's incredibly cumbersome to have it in bipedal form; you to have reserve cpu power/mechanics/power for balance and shit, while not at all necessary for the tasks at hand.
Yes that's the whole point
...what? Is your point?
I dont care about form, I care about function
They are largely the same in this case.
I do chores for less than that.
And I'm fuckable.
How much do you charge for fucking vs. chores?
...and then doing the fucking chores?
I'm asking for a sick friend.
Are you though?
I am fully functional and programmed in multiple techniques.
They're replacing underpaid immigrant workers with underpaid overseas workers remotely controlling a crummy robot, while some rich techbro asshole in the middle skims off almost all the money. I do hope they fail with this stupid idea, but your techbro will already have made off with the money for their next startup scam.
Who's homes?
Sherlock Homes.
*whose
Knock knock theres? who's
Whose who's?
It's amazing, they can make a 20k humanoid but it's impossible to make a 20k EV car.
Strip the cybercab of all its shitty tech and they could absolutely sell it for $20k.
Here's the neat part: they can't.
Fuck $20K for anything. We need an under $10K car.
I suppose for a large house, $500/mo. is what one would pay for maid service.
I don't believe one robot can effectively clean piss from the corner behind the toilet, AND do laundry, AND clean windows, AND dust, AND clean a shower head, AND clean a refrigerator, etc., etc.
Imagine a robot collecting everything out of a fridge onto a counter, removing the glass shelves, cleaning them, cleaning the inside of the fridge, and then putting everything back without breaking anything, and doing it in 30 minutes. Not happening. Even if it were done completely by remote control, I don't think it could do it.
These things are not anywhere close to a replacement for a human, but they'll keep pushing it.
They have been saying this since the 1990s, Rocky had a robot maid. Useless unless you just want something that kills anything that moves, which would be pretty cool I guess.