this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2026
776 points (99.2% liked)

People Twitter

10525 readers
730 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major celebrity, figure or any politician
  1. If a tweet (or similar) makes a statement of fact, either mark it as "satire" in the body or provide the original source link backing up the statement (see rule 6)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 48 points 3 months ago (4 children)

I remember when people got upset by things like this. I wonder why it's "ok" now.

[–] Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world 38 points 3 months ago

The people who pointed it out got tired, and most people will come to accept anything that doesn't directly harm them if they're not repeatedly informed why it's bad.

[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

People started replying with "nerd-face-emojo acthually" to make fun of anyone that points this shit out.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I remember all the anti-establishment, anti-sellout, anti-consumerist comics from the 1980's.

Pancreatic cancer did Bill Hicks a huge fucking favor.

[–] musicalphysics@discuss.online 4 points 3 months ago

The rest of us are poorer for it. Here’s Tom with the weather.

[–] Elting@piefed.social 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It can in some cases be beneficial to have a windowed graph like that. Most of the time I see one it is just misleading though.

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 8 points 3 months ago

I'd argue it's only useful when you have more than two data points. With only two, it's almost always going to be misleading in some way at a glance.