this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2026
305 points (96.1% liked)

pics

29115 readers
955 users here now

Rules:

1.. Please mark original photos with [OC] in the title if you're the photographer

2..Pictures containing a politician from any country or planet are prohibited, this is a community voted on rule.

3.. Image must be a photograph, no AI or digital art.

4.. No NSFW/Cosplay/Spam/Trolling images.

5.. Be civil. No racism or bigotry.

Photo of the Week Rule(s):

1.. On Fridays, the most upvoted original, marked [OC], photo posted between Friday and Thursday will be the next week's banner and featured photo.

2.. The weekly photos will be saved for an end of the year run off.

Weeks 2023

Instance-wide rules always apply. https://mastodon.world/about

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JayDee@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 31 minutes ago) (4 children)

How many people actually live in the Falklands? Looks like there's mostly nothing on that island. Edit: Looked it up, it's about 3,600. So an incredibly small population. Census shows over 60% of that population is labelled 'immigrant', so non-indigenous.

I know Falklanders want to remain in UK control majority-wise. I also somewhat get why Argentina wouldn't want what is essentially a potential base of operations off their coast (though realistically they couldn't really do anything about it even if they did have sovereignty over it).

EDIT: as mentioned in another person's comment, Argentina also wants it for the fishing rights. The fishing rights area is fairly sizeable, but not, like, HUGE

At the same time, i can't really make sense of why the hell have the british fought to keep ahold of the Falklands. Maybe just because the british just love collecting shit that means nothing to them but have major significance to other nations' people? I don't really get it.

Edit: someone mentioned that the UK wants to keep the falklands in order to maintain claim to Antartica. Weird but okay. Have not looked into that one.

[–] nightlily@leminal.space 2 points 4 hours ago

The UK actually was at one point, in the process of handing over administration to Argentina. The population petitioned parliament to stop it.

While I’m never going to accept that the Brits are over their horrific colonial past and have zero interest in The Falklands, there is a pretty strong moral argument from the indigenous population not wanting to become part of Argentina.

There‘s a bitter sense of irony here.

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 10 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

The Falklands have massive fishing rights over a massively rich area. It has nothing to do with a few thousand people and a few sheep. The UK couldn't care less about the people. Same for Argentina. You don't fight a war over a forlorn rock. Same with Gibraltar ( as the UK has shown with Brexit. Gibraltar is strategically important for Spain and the UK, nothing more. The people are just an excuse)

[–] JayDee@lemmy.world -1 points 6 hours ago

Ah that explains it the best. Now I feel like Argentina has more claim than the UK.

[–] tmijail@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

The islands are the basis for the British's claim to Antarctica

CIA - The World Factbook -- Falkland Islands (Islas Malvinas) https://user.iiasa.ac.at/~marek/fbook/04/print/fk.html