this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2026
167 points (95.1% liked)

Technology

86387 readers
3685 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 8 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

the driver of a Tesla who crashed into a house in June had pressed the accelerator pedal to 100%, overriding the company’s Full Self-Driving (Supervised) software.

Yes the naming convention is dumb but it wasn't at fault here.

[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Can we trust that pedal didn't malfunction this time and was actually pressed?

[–] flubba86@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

If it's anything like the e-pedals user in Subaru and Honda vehicles, they have two different independent position sensors in the pedal. The ecu monitors both, and the value from both must match. If there is a discrepancy, is uses the lower value or zero. So it's extremely unlikely the pedal could malfunction in a way to show 100% pressed.

But I don't know if Tesla does the same.

[–] kn33@lemmy.world 8 points 13 hours ago

Even if that was the case, the driver should've pressed the brakes which would've overrode the accelerator.