this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2026
670 points (99.3% liked)

politics

30486 readers
2757 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] zikzak025@lemmy.world 44 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (5 children)

Correct. The US is structured with a hierarchy where federal laws supercede state laws supercede local laws.

The US is not (thanks for the correction) an ICC signatory and is ~~supposedly~~ therefore not obligated to comply with Netanyahu's arrest warrant and ship him to The Hague, ~~but~~ so the ICC can't compel the US federal government to actually do anything about it.

As much as it is a crime drama meme, diplomatic immunity is still a thing and would preclude his arrest (be it for a local law or attempted compliance with the ICC warrant) as long as the fed asserts that he has diplomatic immunity.

So this is a situation where the only practical option available to try to hold him accountable is vigilantism.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 31 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The US is an ICC signatory and is supposedly obligated to comply

Not anymore. Clinton signed the treaty but never submitted it for ratification, so the US technically was never part of the ICC, and Bush "un-signed" it, absolving the US of any responsibilities whatsoever.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_and_the_International_Criminal_Court

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 16 points 2 days ago

I mean, they could arrest him and immediately get him on a private plane to an ICC country, or the Netherlands, direct to The Hague.

Handling it the way ICE does sending people to various places, including internationally before the courts have a chance to do anything. Malicious compliance.

[–] zikzak025@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Good call, thanks for the correction.

[–] Xaphanos@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

He can most certainly be arrested. He can't be prosecuted. "You can beat the rap, but you can't beat the ride"

A bullshit arrest would be great political theater for the mayor.

[–] socsa@piefed.social 5 points 1 day ago

I mean there's a purely mechanical issue as well, in that Netanyahu would have a bunch of his own armed security, plus US diplomatic security.

[–] taj@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Just because a country isn't "obligated" doesn't mean they can't or shouldn't do what is right.

[–] tacosanonymous@mander.xyz 5 points 2 days ago

He just needs to put Riggs and Murtaugh on it. Ezpz

[–] OS2Warp@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago

So that’s why you can’t legally buy pot in NY, right? Because of the federal law making it illegal?

Oh, wait…..