this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2026
666 points (99.3% liked)

politics

30470 readers
2365 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Netenyahu might not be able to be detained as a head of state, but his consular staff can probably be arrested and detained for questioning. The Us did sign the geneva conventions and are legally bound to act on those. Even just cuffing them and marching them to a car would be great to see. And either way, Mamdani and his state police should be shadowing the war criminals everywhere he goes so that if any new yokrer is threatened or abused, he can step in and literally kick some ass.
Israeli diplomats have a history of roughing up protestors whose messages they dont like. Any of that should be met with immediate overwhelming force by the state of New York to protect the citizens of new york in their right to peaceful protest in the US. No halfassed apologies later, we need interverntion as it happens. If some diplomats get roughed up, well-- we can send an apology for that later. Israel just detained and pointed guns at Ro Khanna the other day. they deserve the same treatment. Guns aimed at their heads.

https://www.ejiltalk.org/the-universal-obligation-to-arrest-netanyahu-and-gallant-ending-state-officials-immunity-saga-with-respect-to-grave-breaches-of-ihl/

[–] Bwaz@lemmy.world 11 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Best not to make such decision public. See whether Netanyahu is willing to gamble.

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 10 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Seems like that’s the point. If they tell him they will arrest him he might not come at all

[–] Bwaz@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

But if he only leaves it "undecided" then Netanyahu will probably chicken out while Mamdani won't be providing ammo for the (US funded) Zionist Israel lobby.

[–] MithranArkanere@lemmy.world 9 points 18 hours ago

Oh, come on! Don't say it out loud! Just prepare quietly. Subrepciously redirect him to a Jet charted to go straight to the Hague. And I don't mean the nearest airport. I mean landing right by the freaking door of the International Court.

[–] Pollo_Jack@lemmy.world 7 points 21 hours ago
[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago

That would, unfortunately, be a big stretch.

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 57 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

In a city of billionaires, Mamdani is not owned, which is why they're all so scared of him: the powers that be can't control him, and they can't even predict him.

Which is exactly what makes this so based. Mamdani IS the mayor of NYC. He could make Bibi's arrival in his city a little slice of hell in all manner of ways, many of which would break no law at all, and many New Yorkers would be thrilled to do their part.

But will he? No one knows. And that's the beauty of it. We all know he's thinking about it now.

So whether this pans out in reality or not, it's always good policy to make a motherfucker watch his own back. Mamdani just turned Bibi into a motherfucker with a back that needs watching in NYC.

[–] Snowies@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago (3 children)

New England loves taking down tyrants. It’s kind of our whole thing 😉

[–] RumRunningDevil@lemmy.zip 4 points 18 hours ago

Loving the recent "New York is a part of New England" trend.

A joint northeastern political identity will help with soft balkanization.

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I thought your whole thing was some of the best chowder in the world?

[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

I thought their whole thing was being massively racist...

[–] MartianRecon@lemmus.org 4 points 1 day ago

Aww two Confederate sympathizers downvoted you.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 135 points 1 day ago (8 children)

For fuck's sake, don't talk about it. Don't posture, don't chest-beat, and don't blather about it in public. Don't give the fucker any warning. Just do it when he shows up.

[–] Bakkoda@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

All he had to do was talk about it and Trump took the bait.

It's free press and great PR.

[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Not responding at all would make people accuse him of being a Zionist. Saying "no, we won't be doing that, are you fucking stupid?" is correct, but would also make people accuse him of being a Zionist. So instead of acting, which he can't do, he's "examining" the possibility and "weighing his options"; those options being jack shit.

Only children or the incredibly stupid think there is any reality where this could happen.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 218 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No,you don't get it. The mere fact that he is talking about it now is a good indication that he's already done all the analysis, and knows he can't take any action. So, by coming out and saying he's "examining" it, he continues to keep the issue in the news and gain popularity on it in spite of knowing the law is not on his side.

He has made the political determination, though, that even New York City, which by some estimations has over 1M Jewish people living in it, is fed up with Netanyahu. Which is pretty remarkable.

[–] kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com 55 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I think the issue comes from a mayor acting on behalf of a country. You really don't want that kind of thing. I agree Netanyahu needs to be arrested and tried for his crimes. I just don't think a mayor could actually do it without federal approval.

[–] zikzak025@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

Correct. The US is structured with a hierarchy where federal laws supercede state laws supercede local laws.

The US is not (thanks for the correction) an ICC signatory and is ~~supposedly~~ therefore not obligated to comply with Netanyahu's arrest warrant and ship him to The Hague, ~~but~~ so the ICC can't compel the US federal government to actually do anything about it.

As much as it is a crime drama meme, diplomatic immunity is still a thing and would preclude his arrest (be it for a local law or attempted compliance with the ICC warrant) as long as the fed asserts that he has diplomatic immunity.

So this is a situation where the only practical option available to try to hold him accountable is vigilantism.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The US is an ICC signatory and is supposedly obligated to comply

Not anymore. Clinton signed the treaty but never submitted it for ratification, so the US technically was never part of the ICC, and Bush "un-signed" it, absolving the US of any responsibilities whatsoever.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_and_the_International_Criminal_Court

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 16 points 1 day ago

I mean, they could arrest him and immediately get him on a private plane to an ICC country, or the Netherlands, direct to The Hague.

Handling it the way ICE does sending people to various places, including internationally before the courts have a chance to do anything. Malicious compliance.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Xaphanos@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He can most certainly be arrested. He can't be prosecuted. "You can beat the rap, but you can't beat the ride"

A bullshit arrest would be great political theater for the mayor.

[–] socsa@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago

I mean there's a purely mechanical issue as well, in that Netanyahu would have a bunch of his own armed security, plus US diplomatic security.

[–] taj@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Just because a country isn't "obligated" doesn't mean they can't or shouldn't do what is right.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dhork@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

There are two reasons he can't do anything.

First is the idea that when the UN chose to place its HQ in New York, the US likely had to agree to safe passage for all diplomats and officials going to the General Assembly. That just makes sense. The UN can't function if the Host Nation gets to control who goes to the meetings.

Second, the US isn't a party to the ICC in the first place, and doesn't formally recognize its jurisdiction. IMO, this is actually the correct position, because the ICC as it is currently run does not guarantee all the protections that US courts grant its citizens, so the US could not subject its citizens to it. (Even Bill Clinton, who signed the treaty at first, acknowledged this and did not send the treaty to the Senate for ratification. George W Bush "un-signed" the treaty a few years later).

So, it really would be impossible for a local police force to arrest a foreign leader with diplomatic immunity on the warrant of a court which is not recognized by the government.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] socsa@piefed.social 8 points 1 day ago

Talking is realistically all he can do since UN is governed by a pretty complex web of federal law. He'd end up in a standoff with the feds and Mossad. Talking about it is more than any other US politician is doing though.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

He’s probably talking about it cause it’s not gonna happen.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] PointyFluff@lemmy.ml 56 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I appreciate when my leaders use their power to arrest war-criminals. It makes the world a safer place

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 6 points 1 day ago

It's been a LONG time since you've felt that appreciation.

[–] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

fucking BASED. This guy is amazing.

Americas Mayor.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca -1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

But not America's President. This is way out of his lane.

[–] Seppo@sopuli.xyz 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Would be a shame if a "malfunctioning" "AI" air traffic controller directed his plane into a tanker truck "mistakenly" left on the runway.

[–] El_Scapacabra@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 day ago

It's crazy but in current day USA people will go "Oh yeah, that's just something that happens sometimes."

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Just roll up on him like the US marshals did yesterday to the Tate brothers.

[–] JamieDub86@piefed.social 3 points 22 hours ago

Still kind of surprised that happened.

[–] Puddinghelmet@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Yeah why does USA not want international law? The U.S. has never ratified the ICC because why would they give up the freedom to do what they want… USA does not recognize the jurisdiction of the ICC. The 2002 American Service-Members’ Protection Act (ASPA) literally states that the U.S. will attempt to protect U.S. military personnel and other citizens from ICC persecution, even with military action if necessary. That bill was nicknamed “The Hague Invasion Act” because in theory it authorizes the president to use force to free Americans from ICC prison. They even go as far as using big tech to blackmail members of the ICC that investigate war crimes of the US military (or Israel). crazy.

Neither USA nor Israel is among the 125 signatories of the Rome Statute, which established the ICC in 1998. However, the treaty sets out that nationals of non-member states can be tried for crimes that take place on the territory of states that are signatories. But if mamdami arrests netanyahu and delivers him to The Hague that would be a dream for everyone who wants global peace and justice, probably followed by sanctions from crybaby trump tho lmao

[–] JamieDub86@piefed.social 1 points 22 hours ago

Im probably being awkward or something, but wont there be other Netanyahus?

Its like if Trump goes away, people wont put down their pitchforks and torches and find something else to do.

[–] redlemace@lemmy.world 44 points 1 day ago

i'd love to see him pull that one off!

[–] sunbytes@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

It may be he's just bluffing to keep Netenyahu out of the city.

It's not a good look for Mamdani to let him in the city while doing nothing about it (or even being forced to provide security for him), but actually arresting him might cause a small civil war.

[–] VirtuePacket@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

As much as I'd like to see it, it's just posturing. Congress has explicitly stated that state and local LEOs cannot recognize or enforce ICC warrants.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago

Let him sit in Riker's while the case drags though the courts. Probably take at least a couple of years before SCOTUS forces his release. He deserves a lot more than 2 years in prison, but it's better than nothing.

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 day ago

ah, yes, congress, famously known for upholding the law and morality of late

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Its not like Trump listens to congress or rules.

[–] VirtuePacket@lemmy.zip 2 points 14 hours ago

True. I don't think that gives Mamdani license to do the same.

load more comments
view more: next ›