this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2023
83 points (98.8% liked)

Canada

10333 readers
782 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ttmrichter@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Wouldn't it be better to boost long-term personal residence ownership? Boosting the number of people renting is just a way, it seems, of exacerbating the heart of the housing problem.

[–] MajorMajormajormajor@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They need to do both. There are always going to be people who want/need to rent due to life circumstances as house ownership ties a person to the local area for an extended period of time. We need people to have the choice of moving, not never leaving their place because everywhere else is far more expensive than their current rates.

However, people who are ready to buy shouldn't be faced with property values 10-20 (or more depending where they are) times their annual salary. The issue is that housing needs to stop being seen as a investment and retirement fund, and just as a basic necessity of life.

How do you ruin an entire generations retirement plan when that's all they have? How do you screw over the following generations when most won't have anything?

[–] ttmrichter@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

You vote Liberal or Conservative. That's how.

[–] nik282000@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Oh boy, slightly left criminal twits or harder right criminal twits. How can I ever decide!

[–] ttmrichter@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

False dichotomy.

Now try more left. And even more left. Canada isn't a two-party system, de facto or otherwise. Stop learning from the fucking Yanks.

[–] MajorMajormajormajor@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago

Good thing we have that election reform right? Right?

[–] AnotherDirtyAnglo@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago

You boost ownership by making it infeasible to be a landlord... You tax the fuck out of residential property ownership that is not your primary residence. If you own a home you don't live in, 1% tax on the total value of the home, every year... And that tax rate increases at 2x the rate of inflation, every year. Within a decade or two, the housing market gets fixed as each individual owner determines that their 'income property' isn't profitable anymore.