this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2023
83 points (98.8% liked)

Canada

7204 readers
329 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MajorMajormajormajor@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They need to do both. There are always going to be people who want/need to rent due to life circumstances as house ownership ties a person to the local area for an extended period of time. We need people to have the choice of moving, not never leaving their place because everywhere else is far more expensive than their current rates.

However, people who are ready to buy shouldn't be faced with property values 10-20 (or more depending where they are) times their annual salary. The issue is that housing needs to stop being seen as a investment and retirement fund, and just as a basic necessity of life.

How do you ruin an entire generations retirement plan when that's all they have? How do you screw over the following generations when most won't have anything?

[–] ttmrichter@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You vote Liberal or Conservative. That's how.

[–] nik282000@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh boy, slightly left criminal twits or harder right criminal twits. How can I ever decide!

[–] ttmrichter@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

False dichotomy.

Now try more left. And even more left. Canada isn't a two-party system, de facto or otherwise. Stop learning from the fucking Yanks.

Good thing we have that election reform right? Right?