this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2026
327 points (98.8% liked)

politics

30535 readers
2712 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A senior Pentagon official has been placed on leave after he was secretly filmed criticizing President Donald Trump's administration and the changes it has implemented at the Department of Defense.

Right-wing activist James O'Keefe released a video on Wednesday reportedly showing Brandon Newsom, a senior official in the Office of the Secretary of the Navy, being filmed with a hidden camera. Newsweek has not independently verified the footage.

In the footage, Newsom can be heard saying that he wanted to "stay and stick it out" at the Pentagon, adding: "So that way, when the time comes, I can undo whatever's been done [by the Trump administration]." When asked about what he would undo, he talked of "a lot of times" when working at the Pentagon "challenges my morals," saying he would not have "one specific prayer service" and undo employee "schedule policy."

He also called Trump "a textbook narcissist" and described the Iran war as "completely stupid" and "driven by one man's ego."

Good to know there's still good people in the military (1 less now, but this show they're there).

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Good to know there’s still good people in the military (1 less now, but this show they’re there).

Not sure I would say that a person that is doing something they admit to know is/was wrong "good people"

[–] credo@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

You have a very naive black-and-white view of the world. I guess that Schindler guy was bad too, huh?

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Schindler was actively cheating the Nazis, this guy is apparently just waiting out the storm…

Show me what "good" this guy has done and we'll talk…

[–] credo@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

How the fuck would you or I know? Did Schindler post his actions somewhere?

FFS. Think.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world -2 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

How the fuck would you or I know? Did Schindler post his actions somewhere?

LOL this is such an American response… I'll let you in on a little secret: such knowledge is hidden inside obscure devices called Books

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

“American response “. Let’s analyze your country…

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 1 points 40 minutes ago

why? so you can pretend there is nothing to be fixed in yours until America is literally the worst of the worst?

[–] credo@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 1 points 36 minutes ago

ok, tell me how america will fix the 180 little girls slaughtered in the first salvo in Iran? of the 200+ people America executed in the Caribbean?

My comcent here is not universal to all in the same situation… a librarian forced to hide good books and showcase Mein Kampf can absolutely hold and fix things when the opportunity arises… the military cannot

[–] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 50 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm conflicted.

On one hand, I think people should leave their positions if they're being used for evil.

On the other hand, how do we adequately resist fascism without people on the inside at the highest levels willing to side against the fascists when the opportunity presents itself?

I'm not absolving this guy for anything he may have contributed to the fascist agenda, but having people on the inside to resist it is necessary. Few of those people will ever be squeaky clean.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 11 points 1 day ago (3 children)

On the other other hand, hopefully when people like that leave an organization (military or a company in general) they take a knowledge base and experience with them, making things dumber and less efficient.

But I agree, I'd rather have a mole on the inside doing what good they can to block the march to evil.

[–] credo@lemmy.world 0 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

People that think the organization revolves around them are also narcissists. No. When they leave, the inevitable march will continue. The knowledge will be filled- if not now- later, by more fascists.

That’s effectively what this argument leads to. More fascists in the government.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 0 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

if you have not noticed, an inevitable feature of these fascists is that they are incredibly mediocre… I rather see the military crumble under their ineptitude than help them along the way pretending to be "the good guy"

[–] credo@lemmy.world 0 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Right. So you genuinely think it will crumble if only those with upstanding morals leave.

Naive. Try reading a book, something outside your echo chamber pehaps

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 1 points 32 minutes ago

So you genuinely think it will crumble if only those with upstanding morals leave.

not just leave, oppose

Explain to me how do you oppose fascism by doing everything they want you to do but secretely not like it?

[–] impairedimperator@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago

They do!

The knowledge base that is leaving are the people that understand that starting random wars is stupid.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But I agree, I’d rather have a mole on the inside doing what good they can to block the march to evil.

If this person was doing that, then I would reconsider my opinion but it looks (from the post) that he was not resisting and just hoping to be around to clean some of the mess later...

The problem here is that his job is not making a bug free video game... his job is ultimately to kill people so I find it hard to accept it is OK for him to do that but just regret it a little and that means he is a good person

[–] zarathustrad@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

So, you prefer the timeline where all honest and good high ranking military either immediately resign in protest, or "resist" which will mean immediate termination and possible charges. Vs the one where they maintain position and stay ready to resit when it might matter?

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Absolutely!... if the USA had staged a general strike, the child rapist regime would have ended in 3 months

If the "honest and good" military ranking had put a stop to this, literally THOUSANDS of lives would not have been wasted in vain.

These "honest and good" are not ready to resist... they are simply doing evil things while knowing they are evil things in hopes of what? are they going to rebuild Iran? are they going to the Caribbean to pay reparations for playing target practice with whatever boat they destroyed?

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I’m conflicted.

Completely understandable

On one hand, I think people should leave their positions if they’re being used for evil.

We are not just talking about "evil" here as in "following orders means this washing machine will not be as reliable as I could make it". In this case we are talking about extreme cases as in "following orders means humans will be slaughtered for no reason at all"

On the other hand, how do we adequately resist fascism without people on the inside at the highest levels willing to side against the fascists when the opportunity presents itself?

Is that what is happening? because what I read was that this person disagreed but followed orders anyway, and just the slightest criticism got him canned... how was he resisting fascism in any way?

I’m not absolving this guy for anything he may have contributed to the fascist agenda, but having people on the inside to resist it is necessary. Few of those people will ever be squeaky clean.

Again, I agree but where is the evidence of ANY resistance?

[–] zarathustrad@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well, the act of criticism is grounds for immediate dismissal.

So what specific resistance are you looking for? That would not simply be the same as walking away, only with added steps and possible retaliation?

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

So what specific resistance are you looking for?

They should have literally voiced their concern and refused to follow illegal commands

You cannot pretend to be a good person when you do evil things, knowing they are evil, simply because you want to save your own status...

[–] Talaraine@fedia.io 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Not gonna downvote you because that is my immediate gut reaction too. But Trump is actively trying to purge anyone who isn't a fascist bootlicker, and if that happens Trump can literally do anything.

I'm a black/white kind of person and I really struggle with this, but am trying to keep a broader perspective.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

But Trump is actively trying to purge anyone who isn’t a fascist bootlicker, and if that happens Trump can literally do anything.

I believe the orange child rapist has already achieved this... what is he not allowed to do?

I understand the concept of what you are saying but this individual was not resisting at all, just begrudgingly doing what his fascist bosses told him to. He was helping fascism just as much as the bootlickers (probably more because those bootlickers tend to be incredibly inept)

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 0 points 1 day ago

Life ain't black and white, and it's extremely callow to expect it.