this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2026
345 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

86600 readers
3401 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

From what I understand, it was never supposed to be a truck, it was supposed to be a tax write-off for businesses. That's also why it's stupid ugly and heavy, it has to be 500 or 600 lbs (I forget which) to get the write-off as a truck. The fact that everyone laughs when they see them was unexpected. I think they thought it would be loved by all, especially the businesses.

A new piece from Bloomberg makes the case, comparing the Tesla vehicle to the misfortunes of Ford's Edsel, which was first introduced in 1957 and discontinued just two years later. After spending years building up hype for the car, Ford predicted selling 200,000 units in its first year, but ended up selling less than a third of that.

That's comparable to expectations versus reality of the Cybertruck. In fact, the Cybertruck is actually doing worse in key ways. Tesla's annual sales target was 250,000 units, but it didn't even crack 40,000 sales in its first year. And like the Edsel, it's sold less with each successive year, with barely 7,100 registered in the US in 2026 so far, according to S&P Global Mobility data — despite Musk juicing those figures by selling Cybertrucks to his own companies.

[–] smellhound@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

I think you forgot a zero, right?

  • Rear-Wheel Drive (Single Motor): 6,118 lbs (2,775 kg)

  • All-Wheel Drive (Dual Motor): 6,634 to 6,669 lbs (3,009 to 3,025 kg)

  • Cyberbeast (Tri-Motor): 6,863 to 6,898 lbs (3,113 to 3,129 kg)

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago

Yep, you're correct, my bad

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago

Yep, forgot a zero, lol

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

6,000, not 600. 600 would be a very light vehicle indeed. Even the Reliant Robin is about 970. The Smart Fortwo is at least 1,800.

Or it has to have certain offroading features.

https://www.autoblog.com/features/everything-is-an-suv-today-because-of-this-fuel-economy-loophole

[–] RattlerSix@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

The IRS gives business tax deductions for vehicles. Under 6000lbs it's $12k, over 6000 is $31k

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

Also the rest of the theory is as inaccurate as the weight figure.