this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2026
286 points (99.7% liked)

Canada

12197 readers
367 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


🌐 Other Relevant Communities


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Shopify CEO draws criticism for apparent support of giving wealthy more voting power. Just more ridiculous by the day.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

So? That already exists in the one person, one vote system.

You're literally proposing to give 100x more voting power to the people being influenced by billionaire propaganda.... that is absolutely NOT what already exists today

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

If everyone except billionaires has 100 votes, then everyone (except billionaires) has an equally weighted vote.

Again, this is not the system I want. I think one person, one vote is best. But if we’re altering the deal, fuck billionaires, you get no vote.

E: sorry for the comment spam, I was getting errors that said the comment wasn’t made when it actually was.

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 days ago

If everyone except billionaires has 100 votes, then everyone (except billionaires) has an equally weighted vote.

Again, this is not the system I want. I think one person, one vote is best. But if we’re altering the deal, fuck billionaires, you get no vote.