this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2026
1431 points (99.7% liked)

Technology

86803 readers
5551 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The products covered by the obligation to repair currently include:

  • washing machines and washer-dryers
  • dishwashers
  • refrigerators
  • electronic displays
  • welding equipment
  • servers and data storage products
  • mobile phones, cordless phones and tablets
  • tumble dryers 
  • e-bikes and e-scooters batteries (from 18 February 2027)
  • local space heaters
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dan1101@lemmy.world 182 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Hopefully this will benefit other countries indirectly, instead of designing one repairable phone and one not repairable, should be easier to just design one.

[–] tired_n_bored@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Just like the USB-c on the iphone

[–] undefinedValue@programming.dev 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Even then, Apple maliciously complied. They put shit speed usb-c, (maybe 2.0?) on all but the highest most expensive model.

[–] Dyf_Tfh@piefed.zip 1 points 5 hours ago

Tbf they also did that when they were on lightning.

And they are not the only one to do that. I have a flagship android phone one step before the super flagship but It only got usb 2. It is really annoying to transfer media at such a low speed.

[–] yoru77@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 8 hours ago

I don't think every corporation is as petty as nintendo

[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 141 points 1 day ago (34 children)

"Hold my beer" - Nintendo, releasing an EU centric revision. Meanwhile Apple and Samsung are digging up every legal loophole to prevent the law applying to their devices.

[–] EowynCarter@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

I think Nintendo will transition to having only one version on the long term, precisely not to have to deal with two versions.

[–] IllNess@infosec.pub 52 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Apple and Samsung be like: "It's not a mobile phone or a tablet, it's a phablet so it does not fall in to any category of the devices that need to be repairable."

[–] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 17 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

The loophole in the directive is smaller phones. Smartphones go from 10.16 cm (4 inches) diagonal to 17. 78cm (7 inches) and everything bigger (up to 44.2 cm) is a tablet.

Samsung and Apple's flagship smartphones are very close to be considered tablets but that wouldn't save them from the requirements.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 hours ago

Apple: hey fans, did you know the best phone is actually small?!!

[–] gandalf_der_13te@feddit.org 1 points 11 hours ago

“Hold my beer” - Nintendo, releasing an EU centric revision.

i wonder, do we know what will be the price difference between the EU centric version and the international version?

load more comments (31 replies)
[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 20 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

So I saw that my car offered up all sorts of useful diagnostic information for self diagnosing stuff. Was very excited and went to look at it for a generic fault without having to get software to tell me what the fault is. I thought "it's stupid it has fully functional computer display yet tells me basically "contact a dealer, but it's safe to drive" instead of what the problem is. Then I find out that because I'm in the USA, the company keeps it to themselves...

So if they see value in treating regions differently, they will absolutely go out of their way to screw over the regions that will let them.

[–] freebee@sh.itjust.works 15 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

Car manufacturers screwed over consumers the last 10-15 years big time! Cars used to be the big thing many could fix a lot on by themselves and were proud to do so. Then they basically just said incrementally to the DIY'ers "it's all computers now, not your cup of tea", purposely made cars less and less self repairable and got away with it! It's infuriating.

[–] balsoft@lemmy.ml 5 points 12 hours ago

Computers could make cars a lot more reliable and moddable. It's proprietary/locked-down software and hardware that's the problem.

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 3 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Do you seriously think they computerized cars to make them less repairable? That's some tin foil hat stuff there.

They started computerizing cars to make them more efficient, reliable (ironically), safer, etc. The problem is that beyond OBDII there is no standard for diagnostics, and makers keep these proprietary.

[–] freebee@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

They didn't have to keep it proprietary, and I think in many "computer problems" the certified dealers will just replace 1 circuitboard by a new one, but it's a part which private customers are not able to order and replace themselves

[–] freebee@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

They didn't do it for that purpose, I am saying they used the opportunity of cars becoming more digital to make them less repairable outside of "certified dealers"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hikaru755@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago

Okay, but the economics of doing that are different between software and hardware. It's much more expensive to have a full second hardware design compared to just turning a software feature off in certain markets.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lemmygarden@lemmy.today 34 points 1 day ago (17 children)

The past two phones I bought were not because they broke, but because they stopped being supported on apps that I need to use.

[–] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 21 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

That's also included in the directive. Manufactures will be required to provide OS updates for at least 5 years "from the date of end of placement on the market" (which means the date the brand shipped the last device of a model).

They also have 4 months to release security updates and 6 months for functionality updates see ANNEX II for all device categories.

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

That is actually fairly reasonable. I use a 5 yr old Xiaomi which a has 8Gb (as much as an entry level Surface or MacBook. Fuck AI) an octacore CPU, great camera, ultra fast charge, great battery etc. But I realize most people change phones every 2-3 years regardless of how well their phone works, because of "shiny new thing"

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 hours ago

Xiaomi 13T gang? 😁

load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)