this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2026
476 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

86769 readers
4018 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The products covered by the obligation to repair currently include:

  • washing machines and washer-dryers
  • dishwashers
  • refrigerators
  • electronic displays
  • welding equipment
  • servers and data storage products
  • mobile phones, cordless phones and tablets
  • tumble dryers 
  • e-bikes and e-scooters batteries (from 18 February 2027)
  • local space heaters
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] defaultusername@lemmy.dbzer0.com 42 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

Interesting things that are not on the list:

  • Farming equipment
  • Motor and electric vehicles
  • Computers (including laptops)
  • Video game consoles
  • HVAC systems and equipment

Not sure if smart TVs fall under "electronic displays", or if they just mean commercial displays when they say that.

[–] TeaWithDani@lemmy.world 5 points 17 minutes ago

Farming equipment is a particularly annoying one, that and construction vehicles, are becoming increasingly locked down by proprietary software and impossible to maintain yourself. You can't even employ mechanics outside the dealer network in some instances and it will be more so in the future.

[–] BeatL@pawb.social 16 points 2 hours ago

not yet ! we hope !

John deer tractor lost a case that became famous in my rural area (and elsewhere). It now have to let repair shop acces the tools and allow repair on its tractors.

I take the win ! And we continue to push forward in talks, petitions, actions and repairs (autorised or else) Support and/or use open source.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

It's a good start.

Pisses me off that laws are required for this, but that's what we get for being ruled by the Epstein Class.

[–] grapefruittrouble@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Good start I guess but missing plenty of things that others have already pointed out. This list only covers like half of devices in a household. Also, what is stopping companies from pricing replacement parts way out of proportion because of this? Even more than they already do now to prevent repairs

[–] Einhornyordle@feddit.org 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Great in theory until companies start charging 80% of the product price for a single spare part so you'd rather buy a new product than try to repair your existing one.

[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 hour ago

Depends on how it's done. If they have to make schematics and binaries available, it's different than having to provide parts at whatever cost they'd like.

[–] dan1101@lemmy.world 90 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

Hopefully this will benefit other countries indirectly, instead of designing one repairable phone and one not repairable, should be easier to just design one.

[–] farmgineer@nord.pub 2 points 1 hour ago

I've read a couple stories of companies (planning to) release EU-only models there, but non-EU-compliant ones everywhere else.

[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 69 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

"Hold my beer" - Nintendo, releasing an EU centric revision. Meanwhile Apple and Samsung are digging up every legal loophole to prevent the law applying to their devices.

[–] IllNess@infosec.pub 15 points 2 hours ago

Apple and Samsung be like: "It's not a mobile phone or a tablet, it's a phablet so it does not fall in to any category of the devices that need to be repairable."

[–] lemmygarden@lemmy.today 16 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

The past two phones I bought were not because they broke, but because they stopped being supported on apps that I need to use.

[–] YoSoySnekBoi@kbin.earth -3 points 4 hours ago (2 children)
[–] lemmygarden@lemmy.today 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)
[–] YoSoySnekBoi@kbin.earth 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Huh...I'm guessing banking apps? Those are the only ones that have ever given me problems on old Android devices

[–] ikirin@feddit.org 10 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Good, now let's increase the list and also add vacuum cleaners to it! I thought that they already were but seemingly not :(

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

For mine replacing the roller belt would require replacing the entire head. So damn wasteful.

[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 19 points 5 hours ago

This is good.

The RIGHT to repair does you no good if the thing itself is not DESIGNED to be repaired.

[–] tjoa@feddit.org 25 points 5 hours ago

This is a step in the right direction love it. Although I got a reality check recently when I bought a washing machine and had a chat with the guy selling them new and used. He said that from 201X onwards basically the manufacturers constructed the insides of them in a single piece which is 350€ and with that it’s not economical to fix them. So yea technically they are repairable. But I have not much hope that this will actually change something for consumers or the environment.

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

I wonder how it handles things like protected software code? Repairable probably would mean buying an electronics module worth more than the device.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 9 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I wonder why the US doesn’t have this law.

Hmmmm. 🤔

[–] blargh513@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I hold out the thin hope that manufacturers will not want to split their product lines any more than they have to and will make these devices available globally.

It's possible that they want to hang on to the revenue streams that making irreparable garbage generates, but it would have to be greater than the cost of designing and manufacturing a second product line for most of their stuff.

Kind of how like when dumbass apple was forced into USB-C in the EU and they finally gave up on their own charge cables globally.

[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

That's a good example. You've sold me on the hope!

[–] myrmidex@belgae.social 5 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (2 children)

wake me up when German cars are on the list. Until then I'll regard this as purely performative and will be overturned in some months.

Also: making repairable the very cell phones on which they require constant monitoring of private communications reeks of hypocrisy.

Yes I'm skeptical about all this.

[–] Babalugats@feddit.uk 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

This is purely performative, but won't be overturned.

it's unlikely that spurious/generic parts will work unless they want them to, and even then they'll be less effective.

Their official parts will likely be more expensive, so they'll be easier to repair, but cost a lot more, instead of paying the repair shop.

The devices or machines will no longer become waste as much, but the parts will. Warranties will be voided etc.

What would've been a better law to introduce would be introducing a minimum time limit on planned obsolescence with the right to repair.

Also, in the EU many countries have law that supercedes EU warranty.

If your device has an inherent defect (was always going to break no matter what you did with it) and sometimes may need to be proven in a court of law, The warranty can be extended to 7 years (some countries are shorter).

For example if you buy a TV, and after 4 years it develops a fault outside the normal warranty, and you find out that, that model has a known fault that happens to a few of them, don't try to repair it and void the warranty.

It may be still protected by that warranty in your country.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

Don't worry, the phones don't have to be repairable as long as they are waterproof.

[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 10 points 5 hours ago

This is excellent news, but I really wish this same logic will spill into the recent "stop killing video games" movement as well.

That whole fight was really about consumer protection as well, not just about video games IMO.

I want to be able to be easily repair and support products that are past their manufacture supported end of life. This goes for both physical products and digital products!

[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

So what exactly does this entail? Is Bosch going to make their dishwashers less awful to repair? Or are they going to say "well it's possible to repair it, and it's not glued shut like a phone, so we're good."

[–] laranis@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago

Yeah, feels like devil is in the details. Lots of gray area in "repairable".

[–] sahin@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

F.cking Great News! Next: forcing every product to be open source, and durable. 100 years for a product is not a dream. We already have products, used for more than 50 years.

[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 hours ago

Libertarians in shambles.