this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2026
90 points (94.1% liked)
Fediverse
43327 readers
1377 users here now
A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, Mbin, etc).
If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!
Rules
- Posts must be on topic.
- Be respectful of others.
- Cite the sources used for graphs and other statistics.
- Follow the general Lemmy.world rules.
Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I support the idea of a federated employment platform. However I see no reason for an employment platform to have social features.
I have only received jobs for the last 10 years via social features. I hate it, I don't enjoy it, but networking and people skills are the way to a good network. I started blogging and recruiters started pinging me regularly. It has a place
Thats great, you can network and have people skills on social media and link from there to your professional bio. There's no reason for them to be in the same place.
Except, I don't want those people in my regular circles on my regular accounts, I keep work and personal separate. I'd prefer to have a separate account, just like this that's linked to my professional life. This fills that need for me
So create a separate account. There's no reason it needs to be on a dedicated platform.
So you want to separate things so they're all in their own little spheres... so that there's less dedicated services?
Where would I put my CV and professional details, my skills and abilities? I don't know man, I see some real value here, what's the harm of it?
On a separate, professional site.
The harm is filling a professional website with a bunch of noisy nonsense no one cares about. I don't need to see your federated OnlyFans profile when I'm looking for an employee.
Don't subscribe to users from there then, and even then doesn't sound like this would be federated?
That's quite literally what this app appears to be trying to do.
Then why is "fediverse" in the title of the post?
Except it's not, it's trying to be another social media platform.
Yes? I don't understand the point you're trying to make now. CVs, skills, etc sound specific to this so they wouldn't be federated. Social features like posts, replies, comments would be, as they match ActivityPub, they're not extending the protocol or anything for it.
So I really don't understand why you're so upset at the app. If you don't want the professional stuff then it's as simple as not signing up for an account. If you don't want any social things from them then it's the same as any activitypub: defederate or block.
You don't like it, I think that's obvious, but I don't understand the multi-comment thread where your argument seems to be "I don't like it so it shouldn't exist". You don't have to understand why other people find it useful for it to be useful to those other people.
The point is professional platforms should not be filled with whatever whims come across your mind that day. It is a 100% completely redundant function, in the wrong place.
I don't understand why you think I'm upset. You seem to be equating the number of comments I write with some sort of level of anger. In which case, I must ask why you're so upset? I just think it's dumb.
Yes you are very passionate if you've left so many comments about this, which is why I go back to my base question - why not just ignore it then if you find no use out of it?
I could ask you literally the same question.
Simple, I think it's a great idea and so I care about it.
You should try not to get so worked up about it.
I know we love to hate on LinkedIn, but honestly there are plenty of reasons to want social features about employers and jobs. Reviews, salary discussions, union organization and all such stuff that employees could leverage against employers, for instance.
Of course that's not what LinkedIn is largely used for because it's full of employers trying to brand themselves or influencers trying to make an image for themselves. But it could be different, I think.
sounds like linkedin x glassdoor, really. except people on glassdoor are assholes too.
maybe it cancels out.
theyre one company now, so they get to be assholes together
oh that's not an exploitable combination of properties at all
These are all things that could be designated to one or the other, as appropriate. There's no reason they need to be in the same place and every reason not to.
Not sure I understand - you think some of those things don't belong on the fediverse? What do you mean "one or the other"?
1 = social media
"the other" = Professional business platform
I think these things should be separate.
I feel like that's an unnecessarily narrow view of what the fediverse can be. The fediverse is not only for any single particular social networking use case, like micro-blogging (Mastodon) or forums (Lemmy, Pyfed etc). It can be much more than that, and all of it at the same time. There's no reason why the fediverse should restrict itself to only certain social media use cases.
The fediverse is already broken up across way too many usecases, such that I have to have a profile for videos, a profile for podcasts, a profile for my blog, a profile for communities, etc. etc. and they want to add another one.
On that I agree. It'd be nice with a more universal platform.
Right? In what way does it help anything? Only makes things worse.