this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2026
365 points (99.5% liked)

Today I Learned

30917 readers
827 users here now

What did you learn today? Share it with us!

We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.

** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**



Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AuroraZzz@lemmy.world 58 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Maybe make your metro usable so not driving would be easier. It's kind of impossible to get where you need to go without a car in LA

[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

More people taking transit will help put pressure on improving it.

[–] Pechente@feddit.org 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I agree but I think it’s much easier the other way around. First improve the infrastructure, then incentivize people to use it.

[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I have to admit that I'm unsure how LA does it, but up in Washington the voters have to approve more funding for transit. Which is difficult if voters feel like transit doesn't work well to begin with and then it's an uphill battle.

Double-edged sword, I'll admit.

[–] Steve 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's a chicken-egg problem.
A double-edged sword is something that could hurt as much as it helps if you're not careful.

[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hah you're right! I'll blame it on my lack of coffee thus far this morning ;)

[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Should try a double-sided coffee :)

[–] THB@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

LA is a tough one for this because it's so spread out. San Francisco has a famously amazing BART system but the city is also very tiny compared to what most people think of as "LA".

Depending where you live and where you go, LA Metro can be useful. I use the Metro quite often, and I know the bus system is pretty expansive as well. They've also consistently been adding new lines and stops including a way to get to LAX via Metro. So it's not like improvements aren't being made.

[–] alternategait@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Love that you're holding BART up as a shining example.

For getting to anywhere in the city it's awful. Within the city all lines share the same stops. if you want to go east-ish/west-ish either no you don't, or you have to transfer to a bus (which is an additional fare since MUNI is a different agency).

So would it be better at getting people into the city? Again, no. To go from my school (Cal State East Bay) to 16th and mission, a place that I went to basically weekly took about 58% longer than driving (I'm bad at math, so that may be off, but 40 vs 70 minutes). Additionally, I just did a fare caluclation, and now a round trip fare for that trip is $13.50. If I drove, it's 2 gallons of gas and the $8.50 bridge toll. While driving is slightly more expensive, the save time and "last mile" convenience usually outweighed it for me.

Oh, and the hours were super limiting on week nights (when I would go to the city).

[–] blarghly@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, zoning reform needs to happen before transit is a viable option. Miles and miles of low density sfhs and strip malls will never be able to be effectively served by transit because a transit system can't possibly be efficient enough to both serve a reasonable number of people and get people where they are going in a timely fashion. Its just geometry.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

Yeah, a train won't do much without transit oriented development.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works -3 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 41 seconds ago) (2 children)

Famously amazing BART system

Haha….hahahahHahahahaHAHAHA

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

…you spend too much time on Internet forums and not enough time riding transit lol

Edit: I see the “Your lived experience is invalid” people are showing up today.

[–] dreamkeeper@literature.cafe 1 points 1 hour ago

Wow that edit makes you look such an idiot. Go re-read your comment again.

[–] THB@lemmy.world 7 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

... I've been to SF several times and used the system, it's great. Also to add, since you enjoy being condescending, I've used public transport in Asia and Europe as well. So.. haha?

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

These are two separate comments.

The metro is usable.

It’s still impossible to get around LA without a car. It’s a very large spreadout city.

[–] pemptago@lemmy.ml 6 points 23 hours ago

Not impossible. Just very difficult. Source: I lived there for several years without a car, moved close to where I worked (twice), biked and walked most of the time, some public transit when the routes lined up, had very little social life. If there was a special event across town, could use some money saved from not having a car to spring for a taxi.