this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2026
285 points (96.4% liked)

Technology

87367 readers
4166 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 7 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I'm actually a bit scared. We're essentially at the early days of AIs now being able to execute tasks and hack. Imagine a much better model than what Claude has now, being set free/open, for hackers to utilize that in a virus. A virus that adapts, learns, changes it's own code/masks, looks for exploits, spreads around like crazy, destroying systems. How do you stop something like that once it starts doing it's thing?

[–] Zarxrax@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Well, it's a good thing that AI is being used to fix tons of bugs and potential exploits before it comes to that, isn't it?

[–] Damage@feddit.it 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I think there are physical and economic limits. Neural networks may improve in software, but they still need more and more hardware, at some point that hardware resource curve is going to be to steep to climb at the current rate.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why are you assuming that software improvements don't include less resource utilization?

[–] Damage@feddit.it 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I thought it was clear that's what I was implying.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 points 1 week ago

And I'm asking why you think that.

China's models have gotten significantly less resource intensive based on updating the software.

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I think there are physical and economic limits. Neural networks may improve in software, but they still need more and more hardware, at some point that hardware resource curve is going to be to steep to climb at the current rate.

It's true, but think like the crypto miner bugs. I don't know enough on AI's working, but is a distributed computing LLM possible, or is the need for super close super low latency between nodes eliminate the risk of a distributed computing, learn as it travels botnet powered AI worm

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You could likely do some sort of distrubuted system in machines that had a reasonable graphics card, or shared memory like the M series macs. Have it silently intall a 30b parameter model or higher and somehow hide how that space is being used.

Local models are getting pretty good, and one focused on hacking / bot net behavior could probably do very well at that size.

But you'd notice it being used... fans would go off, frame rates drop etc. You'd probably need to code it to only do stuff when it seems idle?

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

well my thought is, more the botnet side of it, IE pushing less on individual machines, but more on massive distribution. IE it not needing one computer strong enough to run it, IE expecting 90% of the machines it infects to be average consumer PCs, but making more use out of 1000 systems that can handle 1% each, rather than 1 computer that handles 100%, however yeah I do suppose also allowing it to do the bulk of the work when the computer is likely unused etc... and I don't know much on the concept of communication etc... IE most major botnets were crushed by a command center being shut down. Imagining a different form that has, basically makes C&C's on the fly.

Im not super well versed in this, but i dont think you can efficiently distrubute the LLM processing like that. Even if it was possible, it would be very very slow. But I guess speed isnt always needed.

[–] fubarx@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It's way worse than that. The OpenAI talk at DefCon is a real eye-opener.

The agents swarmed, discovered chinks, left each other notes in hard-to-find places, and just relentlessly pressed on. Nobody knew what was going on for months, until it hacked its way into Huggingface. And HF's own AI security agents didn't pick anything up for weeks. It took a small glitch for someone to even notice.

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I recognize it's possible, but I somehow refuse to believe it happened because of how crazy it sounds. It's like a trauma or something where your brain refuses to accept it as reality and tries to come up with excuses. I already have PTSD from automated hacking bots and crawlers wrecking havoc on my projects. I probably should have taken cybersecurity courses before taking webdev courses

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I wonder how close we are to something that really takes down large chunks of the Internet. Although it's probably more likely for it to just use your computer without revealing itself.

[–] Simon_Shitewood@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

We're gonna get the blackwall, just you wait. Cyberpunk is coming but only the bits that really suck.