Self-Hosted Main

502 readers

1 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

For Example

Service: Dropbox - Alternative: Nextcloud
Service: Google Reader - Alternative: Tiny Tiny RSS
Service: Blogger - Alternative: WordPress

We welcome posts that include suggestions for good self-hosted alternatives to popular online services, how they are better, or how they give back control of your data. Also include hints and tips for less technical readers.

Useful Lists

Awesome-Selfhosted List of Software
Awesome-Sysadmin List of Software

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

communick@selfhosted.forum

What service one should NOT self host (alien.top)

submitted 10 months ago by SuperWill5633@alien.top to c/main@selfhosted.forum

116 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Like the title says, I'm new to self hosting world. 😀 while I was researching, I found out that many people dissuaded me to self host email server. Just too complicated and hard to manage. What other services that you think we should just go use the currently available providers in the market and why? 🙂thank you

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] timawesomeness@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Internet-accessible authoritative DNS nameserver(s) (unless you have a completely static public IP).

[–] Tivin-i@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

Any public facing service that other (services) depend on should not be running on a public IP (especially ones that translate addresses, and ones you have to manually update).

You could run an authoritative NS "hidden" where only your secondary NS can reach out to for zone transfers. You could also escape having a public IP if you configure rsync or scripts to update secodary host files on every IP change.