this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2026
235 points (98.8% liked)

News

38902 readers
3236 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

But that doesn’t necessarily mean valuable.

Well, the value in the books is that they (a) haven't been digitized yet and (b) aren't contaminated with AI autowriting.

The buyers that would find the most value in these books are, themselves, AI training companies.

But let me be clear, I’m against their destruction for private use.

shrug That's how books are digitized. You break the spine, split out the individual pages, and run them through an industrial scanner. I guess we can go back to reading from scrolls to alleviate this step. Past that, Idk what the problem is.

The digitized copies should be made freely available, if it all possible.

I don't hate this idea. But I might argue that the Library of Congress should be digitizing published works as part of the copywriting process anyway. And, in fairness, the LoC currently hosts 21 petabytes of digitally archived data across 91 million unique works in 470 languages.

This keeps getting floated as some kind of scandal. I see it compared to "The burning of the Library of Alexandra" over and over again. But it appears to be nothing more than another, more primitive form of data harvesting of documents barely more valuable than Reddit shitposts. Less Alexandra and more the graffiti scribbled across Pompeii.