this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2026
73 points (95.1% liked)

Games

50310 readers
1634 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 86 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (8 children)

I feel like they did a shit job tryinf to defend themselves if this is the best example of steps taken:

RxvUGBFyGR7HDnN.png

Like, For Real, this is worthless. Show the messy work files, the unfinished sketches, isolate the layers in the 2D mockup to show lineart and color independent of each other, a gif of the 3D wireframes rotating.

This image they posted won't convince anybody. It will vindicate critics.

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

I'll play devil's advocate and say there are non-AI render processes that can miss a horn (e.g. working from a clay model and scanned, for instance). Hell, even a lazy wand picker in Photoshop can lose a horn! I'll even say that the very-AI looking 2D illustration can simply be a byproduct of a lack of creativity and the fact this is clearly shovelware. I lived through the Wii era, I can attest that shovelware can look this bad without AI, lol.

HOWEVER, it sure as hell looks like AI generated artwork and they could do a lot better defending their process. The irony is ... I don't really think the trailer is AI? It's... honestly too unpolished and weird to be? Every effect used is something I'm certain I could do myself, lol.

[–] PonyOfWar@pawb.social 56 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

Yeah, I really don't want to falsely accuse anyone but... the human 3d-artist forgot to model one of the horns? That redraw has a very, let's say, familiar style as well.

[–] plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works 10 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Says “process” in the title unlike the others, body is missing inside, flame jets are missing as well.

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 10 points 12 hours ago

Body, flame jets and electric textures can be explained as they're not part of the 3d model but effects applied to it in-engine.

The missing horn though screams AI and I have a hard time imagining a human artist forgetting one of the horns when making the 3d model and submitting the work as completed

[–] Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world 7 points 11 hours ago

Yeah that's definitely AI. At least there's no doubt now.

[–] mrmaplebar@fedia.io 23 points 15 hours ago

100% AI slop. These people must think we were born yesterday.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 35 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

i... these are literally all ai. like why would the render be missing a horn?

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 11 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

I'm gonna interject and say you generally model things one half at a time and then mirror for symmetrical objects.

[–] PonyOfWar@pawb.social 34 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

Sure, but you wouldn't just render one horn and add the other one in photoshop. That makes no sense at all. You would duplicate the horn before rendering it.

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 8 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Notice that the milk-bottle-arm in the original somehow ended up as a mega man arm in the end. Like how could a real artist miss that

[–] lime@feddit.nu 6 points 15 hours ago

yeah but you generally also have a hierarchy of submodels so that mirroring a group mirrors everything in that group.

[–] NekoKoneko@lemmy.world 28 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (2 children)

The theory on The Other Site is what I also agree with: They took #1, fed it into an AI 3D modeler to get #4, fed that image into a 2D style AI model to get #2, and then went back to #4 and used AI in-painting and lazy Photoshop to remove some elements to get #3.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 9 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

oh yeah that makes sense, the little bubble window is literally just painted over.

[–] Thorry@feddit.org 5 points 11 hours ago

As well as the weird dark blob where a detail is added in the "final" result. Why would the blob be there? Unless they started with the "final" result and painted it over to get to the "previous" step.

That and the mangled udders clearly scream AI to me. The original clearly has 4 rockets intended to look like udders. But because of the perspective two of them seem to overlap. So the AI just combined them into one, with a sort of double output? This makes no sense, that's not how rockets work and that's not how udders look. It is exactly how AI works tho.

You are 100% correct. 3 obviously was generated from 1, and 2 is just the most blatant 2D genAI image generated from that.

[–] audaxdreik@pawb.social 18 points 15 hours ago

How is this not AI?! The redraw absolutely smacks of that style, not to mention the cannon arm is obviously meant to imitate a milk can which the redraw mangles. The rockets are supposed to be udders but the two we can see most clearly don't match in construction and the other two seems to sprout off of another one. These errors carry over to the full render. The udders are a pixelated mangle of perspective in the original, but this point is absolutely missed.

Above the leg is also a weird split. You can see in the original this is a weird artifact of pixel shading, but it's been rendered into an actual split in the material in the redraw and renders. This is a valid design choice I guess, but to me it's an indication of how the AI misinterpreted intent and someone reviewing it didn't catch or care about it.

[–] RickyRigatoni@piefed.zip 8 points 14 hours ago

This is pathetic. They could have just ai generated fake sketches but they didn't even have the brain power to think of that.