Thorry

The thing that annoys me about this, is the BS Monsanto is pulling puts GMO in a bad light. Humans have been genetically manipulating crops and animals for thousands of years. But in the past it was a messy, slow and imprecise process. These days we have the tools to quickly and precisely adjust what we need to adjust. This is and has been critical for supporting the number of people alive today. Faster growing crops, with better yields, more resistance to diseases and climate change. GMO is absolutely a tool that we need and should continue to use.

But these days so many people believe that when a crop or animal has been genetically modified, it's somehow less healthy to eat. There has been a real wave of people who listen to social media about what is healthy and what is not. Blaming things that are perfectly fine, neutral or even good for you, on a precieved poor health. In reality we (especially in rich countries) are healthier than ever. These people look to things like 'organic' or weird diets such as Paleolithic (but instead of berries and nuts they eat like a cows worth of meat each day) to improve their lives. Companies that used to use chemicals created by mixing some precursors in a clean reactor, are switching over to organic sources. This might sound like a good thing, but I've seen them genetically modify insect that already create the chemical they need in their shells to create lots of that chemical. The insects get bred, boiled and filtered and the chemical is extracted. This leads to a less pure product, with more contaminants, a larger cost, a bigger impact on the environment and more bio-industry. And it's often a chemical that's very common and has been in use for over 50 years with zero impact on health.

Well you might say, let people do their own thing, it's a free country right? Yes, but also no. People having weird diets or listening to Facebook to put olive oil on a dry patch of skin is fine. But it's a slippery slope. These people are losing their faith in science and truth, but instead rely on whatever people say on social media. A place where more and more scammers are active, saying whatever just to get clicks, get sponsors or actively scam people out of their money. This slope then extends into something like homeopathic medicine and nature healing. Which has convinced people in the past that needed real medicine to instead opt for the "natural" option. People have died because of this.

In the past I was still in the camp of let the people chose, who am I to say what is the truth for other people? I don't have all the answers, if they want to do something stupid, that's on them. I also do stupid stuff all the time, just in other ways, should I be disallowed from living my life as I want to? But then the pandemic happened and the people listening to social media instead of science and government started to shout we shouldn't be in lock down, we shouldn't use masks, we shouldn't vaccinate. So my view changed, it's so easy for people to trust what's being said on social media. Foreign actors abuse social media to influence the people, destabilize countries and impact elections. Scammers convince people of nonsense, just to get a few bucks. I'm not sure what the solution is, but I have started to believe we actively need a solution.

Seeing a large company like Monsanto abuse GMO in the ways they do pisses me off. We do not need to feed the fire against using tools like this. We desperately need those tools if we want to continue to exist in the numbers we are today. They should be made an example of and their abuse should be stopped.

Can't we just talk to the humans

A little understanding could make things better?

Can't we talk to the humans and work together now?

I had one of these but it died. One day it simply wouldn't turn on anymore. So YMMV

You should know any man that wears an ascot with pride fucks a LOT.

I've heard it from many people, shame it isn't fixed yet.

I replaced my cable and bought a 5 pack in the store, so if this one starts acting up, I can replace it right away.

I hope they fix that bug where on Linux when the controller disconnects for whatever reason, all of the analog inputs like the triggers and sticks stop working. I connect my controller using an USB-C cable which is kinda broken, it usually works just fine, but every once in a while it disconnects before immediatly reconnecting. Usually that's not an issue, it just hiccups a bit and then I can continue playing. Since it doesn't happen often, I can blame my skill issues on it and I'm lazy, I hadn't bothered to replace the cable. With this annoying bug, I had to restart the game every time it happened. After a couple of times I replaced the cable, but still would be cool if they just fixed it.

Also people running the Windows version of the game on Linux didn't have the bug. So good on them to make a Linux version, but kind of a shame the Windows version on Linux runs better in this aspect at least.

Would have been funny if it was original. Just randomly wasting peoples time with copy-pasta is not cool.

Yes there's also a mechanism in our brains that if a food is high enough in nutrients like calories, fat, etc. we don't feel full and just keep eating. In the past such sources were few and far between, so when one came upon them, we needed to eat as much as physically possible. The issue is, these days we have a lot of food like that. Our brains can't handle it, so we overeat very easily.

Well technically yes, CSD was a thing and allowed mobile phones to connect to the internet. However it wasn't like these days, where you could actually use the internet on the phone. It was a technology that allowed mobile phones to work as a modem. So you'd connect the phone to the serial port of your 90s laptop and could "dial in". The data rate was terrible as well as the latency, but it could allow salespeople on the road to digitally submit orders to the head office for example. This was technically internet, but usually people dialed in to a specific number which only connected to the one server/service. It was also super expensive to do so, so adoption was low.

Internet on mobile phones first started with WAP and I-mode, which are close to internet and technically use the internet, but still isn't the same as what we have these days.

The first mobile pocket devices which could actually browse the internet in a modern way were probably pocket pc's. Especially the Windows Mobile ones that came with a (for the time) very capable browser. They exploded in popularity and soon became available for phones as well. Yes there was a time Microsoft dominated the mobile phone market and caused the juggernaut Nokia to fall. They then completely dropped the ball when they didn't realize they were actually marketing to consumers instead of business and failed to innovate in ways that were more user friendly. Instead focusing on productivity and technical capabilities. Blackberry and Apple swooped in and the rest is history.

That's mostly because digital cameras were known at the time to be extremely shit. I remember having a webcam in the 90s. It kinda sorta worked, but even in high res picture mode it was 640x480 and the images looked like shit. So it would be more a case of convincing people a digital camera can be as good as an old school one. The concept itself would be familiar. In fact, calling it a webcam instead of a digital camera would be a lot easier for a 90s person to understand.

Well WAP and I-mode were both introduced in 1999 and didn't go mainstream till 2000. So I don't think any phone had internet access in the 90s. Even in 2000 most people had a Nokia 3210 or similar, a lot of people still had screens that could only display 2 lines of text at most.

I have issues with calling it the war on science. It's way too close to the war on xmas, which only exists in the minds of delusional right wingers.