this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2026
1179 points (97.0% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

41506 readers
5600 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 8 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Looks like a Canon?

Canon RF lenses are outrageously priced, even amongst other outrageous ILC brands, because they lock out third parties. So yeah, this lady got ripped off.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 4 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Ehh, They're more expensive, but most of them come with IS.

I'd still rather shoot Nikon.

[–] kamen@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

It's not the IS that makes them expensive, it's the locked out ecosystem and the monopoly they have. I'm not saying they're not good - they are (from what I've seen), but healthy competition, if it existed, would've driven the prices down a bit.

As for IS itself, since the move to IBIS, it makes sense that some lenses drop the IS and only rely on the body's. IMO it used to matter in the DSLR days when IBIS was not really a thing. Nowadays it's sensible to only put it into the longer lenses that physically need it (the longer the lens, the more physical movement required to compensate and so on).

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

The APS-C lenses are awful. And the FF ones with IS, especially the zooms, have outrageous barrel distortion that crops the sensor a ton... on $2K lenses.

This is the brand new 20-50mm F/4 for instance, and its not even the worst offender. It's $1400:

The Thypoch 24-50 2.8, for comparison, on Sony E. This is $650, often less on sale:

I'm speaking as someone who mistakenly bought into Canon APS-C. I loathe it, as a hobbyist with a Canon SLR for years.

I'm selling out, as soon as I see with what Fuji/Panasonic/Sony cook up within the year.

[–] Luffy879@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Yes, rf did take a nosedive

How great that there is still EF. I just got myself an r10 since Sony dosent currently have a current aps-c (want that because I throw up from the laggy ones like the 6400 had when I tried it) for around the 600-800€ range.

Also with tamron and others canon also confirmed that they are already licensing third parties.

But if you look at half recent ones like the Canon 70-300 is II USM or even a canon 18-55 is II (or Tamron 17-70 f/2.8, which I currently run, they're perfectly OK for what I'm using them for at least.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

I don't like EF-S on my R50V, same sensor as your R10.

I mean, I have what are supposed to be some great ones. The Tamron 10-20 VC, the sigma 30mm 1.4, the Canon 50-250, the 18-55. They're great on old bodies, they haven't changed, but on modern ILCs the optics, VC, autofocus and weight does not hold it up at all...

And they're all too loud for video.

A Viltrox Air will run circles around them, for less money. Basically any mirrorless lens will. Honestly I'd rather have an old Sony body + a modern Viltrox or Sirui lens now.


(want that because I throw up from the laggy ones like the 6400 had when I tried it)

With Sony bodies, I believe you can change the display refresh rate in the settings, so it doesn't feel so sluggish. The R50/R10 can as well, but I believe the default is just higher.

I'm not trying to simp for Sony or anything though, the prices on their bodies are outrageous. But at least they have an open lens ecosystem.