this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2026
485 points (100.0% liked)

News

38954 readers
1713 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Not sure about grabbing that beer? You're not alone. Americans are reaching for alcohol at record lows, according to a new Gallup survey.

The survey, out Aug. 20, found the number of Americans who say they drink alcohol sits at 54% for the second consecutive year − and health concerns appear to be a major factor.

"Fifty-one percent of U.S. adults now believe drinking one or two alcoholic beverages a day is bad for one’s health," the survey results noted. "The figure is essentially unchanged from last year’s record-high 53%."

In 2001, only 27% considered moderate drinking bad for one’s health, according to Gallup.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Snapz@lemmy.world -4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If you are in recovery, it won't surprise you to hear that alcoholics are often narcissists - the type who may center the whole world's experience on their own.

The vast majority of drinkers aren't addicts though (or are at least very high functioning addicts). They aren't going to be drinking the same grain alcohol or gas station vodka handles that you'd use as an expert to hit your goal quickly and efficiently.

The decline being discussed relates to the fact that you used to be able to go to a bar or your dinner at applebees and get a few beers or some mixed drinks, even a couple/few times a week, without blinking, for the average person.

[–] distal@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If you are in recovery, it won’t surprise you to hear that alcoholics are often narcissists - the type who may center the whole world’s experience on their own.

Just what the guy needs to hear!

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's all throughout the first few steps of the program. Tells you to stop thinking you control the world and admit to yourself that it's all bigger than you.

When folks are in recovery, you don't need to tip toe around them - That was actually a big part of the problem when they were drinking.

And if anyone objects to that, they might want to look into al-anon themselves.

[–] distal@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Yeah, but this is Lemmy, it's not the 12 steps program and I am not tiptoeing around them, nor should the "ban" on tiptoeing be seen as an encouragement to be confrontational.

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And nobody was taking to you or adressing broader Lemmy... This was a response directly to that OTHER person where YOU then felt compelled to interject yourself (funny when the topic is narcissism)

And it's not "encouragement to be confrontational", it's a lack of that barrier when direct talk is warranted.

[–] distal@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

compelled to interject yourself

I'm sorry, this is a public forum for discussion? Everyone can comment and is encouraged to do so. You seem to have forgotten that, since you treat your original response like a PM. A bit self-centred, no?

You bringing up narcissism in first stanza of your reply to the person talking about money not mattering that much is a bit of a non-sequitur. "When direct talk is warranted" reads to me like the tough-love BS people like to reference when they are being paternalistic.

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You know how a park is a public place, and two people can be having a casual conversation? It's not private to the point they need to be behind closed doors, but it's also odd/awkward when someone unknown to both parties just walks up and says, "YOU KNOW EVERYONE CAN COMMENT ON CONVERSATIONS HERE!?!?!?!!!!!"

And the response might be a it of bewildered agreement and something along the lines of...

[–] distal@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

Lemmy isn't a public park either, that comparison is insufficient.