this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2026
150 points (98.1% liked)

News

39029 readers
3006 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Wyoming’s “Stand Your Ground” law says you don’t have to run from a confrontation before defending yourself. That is what Rihanna Kelver and her counsel are asking a Laramie judge to consider as they seek protection from prosecution in a felony case stemming from a confrontation outside the Crowbar.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JTskulk@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Ah I missed that detail, thanks for the clarification. I disagree about the approaching part, anyone can approach anyone in public. Approaching isn't an aggressive action, especially not like pushing someone is. He said words, she got closer and said words, he got physical, she almost got physical back. I hope she beats the rap.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Witnesses say she had her hand at her hip like she was ready to draw a weapon as she approached. She also drew as they were leaving (the push was pushing her out of the way).

And while approaching someone isn't inherently an aggressive action, insulting someone is. Approaching a stranger who is insulting you is escalating things by confronting them.

She also didn't do herself any favors by claiming she pulled a non-existent knife.

But let's swap the genders here, like someone else in the thread said. If a group of black women started calling a white guy a racist, then he went out of his way to confront them about it and got shoved, would we be cool with him pulling a gun? Would we be saying he was just standing his ground?

[–] JTskulk@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I didn't see anything saying that she had her hand on her hip ready to draw, but even if true, so what.

I don't live in a state with these kind of gun laws, but in her state them's the rules. Personally I think getting physical with someone in any way is a big escalation, it's literally a use of force. Force should be reasonably appropriate and somewhat equal, i.e. you don't get to shoot someone for bumping into you at the store (or shoot someone who is not or is no longer a threat, possibly like this situation). You might say the guy had no weapons and simply pushed her, but the fact remains that she returned his force with none. It could have been the case that she got pushed over and then the guy goes to kick or stomp her in which case I think shooting is appropriate. I think the brandishing charge is probably bullshit, because it doesn't seem like she was waving around the gun to intimidate or threaten someone. It sounds like she took out the gun to use it during a physical altercation and then didn't when she realized it was not necessary.

No need to swap genders or substitute ideologically different people, I'm cool with a legally-carried gun being pulled during a defensive physical fight every time. You said that insulting someone is an inherently aggressive action, and sure I'll mostly agree, but the big difference is that it's legal. Insults are fist amendment protected speech most of the time, pushing someone is battery.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I think getting physical with someone in any way is a big escalation,

And it appears that Wyoming considers approaching someone who has had words with you is an escalation.

the fact remains that she returned his force with none.

Brandishing a weapon is... I don't konw if it's a use of force or some other classification, but there are laws against that.

It sounds to me that the court will consider all the arguments and come to whatever conclusion the law specifies. Or maybe it won't and the law should be changed, or....... dunno. Just responding to two minor things you said that I thought required minor replies. :)

[–] JTskulk@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah it's all good man, I appreciate the banter. Now I wish there was an easy way to follow up on this and find out the conclusion.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

Yeah, that's the main problem with this stuff (lemmy/reddit/etc).

The Freedom Fuel thing just popped up again, for example, and until it did I'd forgotten about it. We know more about it now, and if it hadn't popped up again, I'd've never thought about it again. heh.