this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2026
359 points (98.4% liked)

Climate

8945 readers
631 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
359
Cycling like the Dutch would slash the world’s carbon footprint (www.euronews.com)
submitted 19 hours ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
138 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Dutch people cycle an average of 2.6 kilometres each per day. If this pattern was replicated worldwide, the study suggests, annual global carbon emissions would drop by 686 million tonnes.

This mammoth figure exceeds the entire carbon footprint of most countries, including the UK, Canada, Saudi Arabia and Australia.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz -1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Living in a country that is less then half the size of Virginia would also cut the carbon footprint in the US.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

How many USAians not living in the border of their state do regularly travel outside their state?

I doubt many do.

[–] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 1 points 41 minutes ago

More the urban sprawl thing then state to state travel. The idea of living cheek to jowl with a large number of others makes my skin crawl. The noise and pollution would be unbearable (for me). So, it is what it is.