this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2026
304 points (99.0% liked)

politics

31060 readers
2476 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Sen. John Fetterman is lashing out at former aides who accused him of showing indifference toward his work and of routinely skipping constituent meetings, dismissing them as “disgruntled staffers” pushing “smears” to tarnish his reputation.

The first-term Pennsylvania Democrat broke his silence this weekend after The Wall Street Journal published text messages and cited former staffers who contended Fetterman has grown more keen on ingratiating himself with conservative media than on the critical work expected of a United States senator.

Now, former Fetterman staffers have created an anonymous account on X and are threatening to share further unflattering details about the senator, who is facing sagging approval ratings within his own party amid battles with the left over Israel, Iran and immigration — all as he stares at a potential run for reelection in 2028. The senator bluntly warned in July that he would leave the Democratic Party if it adopts an anti-Israel policy — one of his most direct threats yet.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Seems like the DNC is basically a dead organization walking and the DSA and other upstarts are going full grass roots. The left operates better from the ground up anyway.

[–] hoppeduponcoffee@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

We’re like hermit crabs using the shell of a political party that has already died. The only company we have is the rotting little bits of filth left inside.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

The left operates better from the ground up anyway.

Yeah...

The voting members of the DNC agree, that's why they pivoted from neoliberalism to a chair who favors bottom up power structures....

Like, I don't understand how the response to finding out the DNC has been doing what you wanted for over a year, is:

Seems like the DNC is basically a dead organization walking and the DSA and other upstarts are going full grass roots.

Like, they're not competing.

The DSC exists within the DNC...

There's a lot you seem to not understand, and no matter you reply "DNC bad".

Are you mad at what th DNC did 2020-2024? Good, so was the DNC voting members, that's why they didnt double down on Bidens pick (Jamie Harrison), they booted him and turned left.

If you paid even the slightest bit of attention you'd have known all this shit a year ago, but why bother making these comments?

Why not just actually pay attention instead of blindly and beligerntly shitting on the DNC?