this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2026
533 points (98.9% liked)

196

6811 readers
2052 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Alt TextA thread of the posts by @cait.bsky.social. They read as follows:

I had my first talk therapy session with my new therapist and she hit me with the "you're very self-aware" ☹️

not the "pleasure to have in class" of therapy

that's right, I know all the tools and have developed countertools so they no longer work. welcome to thunderdome

Link to post

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ok but it's great for what it's great for. CBT can't fix poverty, but it can fix a tendency to let minor setbacks spiral into full blown panic attacks or an inability to ask loved ones for help.

Plenty of problems aren't the sort therapy can help with despite them having huge mental effects. But plenty of people have problems therapy is actively good for. In the same way therapy won't fix your (rational) economic anxiety, if you torpedo every relationship you're in communism won't fix you, but DBT might.

[–] ignominous_wombat@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

That's great for the people for whom talk therapy and CBT is effective, but the point of my comment and presumably the point of the comment I replied to is that talk therapy using CBT is the de facto standard in the West even when it harms people.

Again, happy that the CBT-lovers have found their thing, but those of us that find it patronizing and minimizing to be told we're what's wrong (for CBT not working like it does for others) instead of the clinical framework not being right for us should have the right to push back against clinicians and pro-therapy laypeople placing specific models of care on a pedestal.

If you can't see that CBT is being applied as a one-size-fits-all solution, especially for young adults and at free/subsidized municipal clinics (who have clients highly affected by poverty and minority stressors), I really don't know what to tell you. It's harmful to people but you feel like you can't talk about it because then people think you're either entirely anti-therapy, antisocial/defiant, or drug-seeking.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ok cool, you're absolutely not taking my argument as I made it. I was acknowledging that it's bad for several things it's bad for (implying it's commonly prescribed for those things) but also acknowledging that it's worth accepting that it's good for what it's good for. Maybe it's bad for some people who have problems it's good for. But I've seen people who desperately need the skills it teaches parrot the rhetoric of it being useless and harmful before so I do feel a desire to speak up in its defense as well.

Hopefully you'll get what you need, regardless of what it is. And yeah, poor people disproportionately need financial assistance more than training to see cognitive distortions.

[–] ignominous_wombat@lemmy.ml 0 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (2 children)

Hopefully you get what you need so that you don't react like someone shot your dog for suggesting CBT isn't the fucking amazing solution you believe it is. I don't need your pity or fake concern.

people who desperately need the skills it teaches

It's ironic that you're the one who thinks your point was completely ignored when you still don't understand that the "skills" it "teaches" to you are not the same skills it teaches others that the framework literally doesn't work for. But it seems like you don't want your preconceived notions challenged by alternative lived experiences, so I suppose that shouldn't be surprising.

I'm sick of paying for therapy that doesn't work and having the therapist not offer me any alternatives other than CBT after years of it not working. I have asked for DBT, knowing it works specifically for me personally (from experience with a sole therapist who actually listened), and been denied because "CBT is more broadly effective." So I'm sort of done propping it up and I want others to stop too.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Ok yeah, wanting DBT instead and not being able to get it because CBT isn't working is infuriating. And in general it really just sucks to deal with providers refusing to accept that something hasn't worked and you'd like to try other things.

Anyways good luck getting DBT, or whatever else works for you. I'm sorry that I came off as dismissive of alternative experiences.

[–] PumaStoleMyBluff@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

There's one person acting like their dog was shot here and it's you

[–] ignominous_wombat@lemmy.ml 0 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Even if that were true, it would be because you're being confrontational about my and others' lived experiences in defense of a clincal practice being broadly applied to people who have stated that it has harmed their mental wellbeing.

I'll never be sorry for asserting my belief in effective mental health management that treats people with dignity rather than CBT-no-matter-what. That's really all there is to it, and you're the one who intially replied to me, so it really does seem from my point of view like you're the one with the issue.

[–] PumaStoleMyBluff@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I'm actually not the same person.

[–] ignominous_wombat@lemmy.ml 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Ah, I didn't notice. You still did initially reply to me though. My first comment in this thread was intended to be commiseration with someone who shares my perspective and I wasn't anticipating being attacked for agreeing that CBT is not all sunshine and rainbows for everyone forced into it.

[–] PumaStoleMyBluff@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

Maybe because you framed CBT as inherently and universally "jank as fuck", without initially acknowledging that there are many situations it does work for.

Also, no one is forced into CBT without a court order.