this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2026
205 points (94.8% liked)

Ask Lemmy

41430 readers
1098 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, toxicity and dog-whistling are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !uspolitics@lemmy.world


7) No Hit-and-Run questions.
Please don't delete your post for no apparent reason. If you plan on deleting a question later, say so in the post, or if you feel that you have a good reason to remove it, message a mod beforehand. It's not fair to the ones who took their time to answer, and it's not in the spirit of the community.


8) No Bots.
Posts or comments from bots, LLM's, AIs, Neural Networks, Transformers, or Marvin the Paranoid Android are not welcome in AskLemmy. Real humans only please.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

it's getting to the point where I notice people say it a lot, especially IRL now for whatever reason recently.

And for clarity I'm not in research or anything, so these people just mean 'LLM/image gen', not utilities like OCR or (usually not) transcription.

Some have argued it's just more efficient (which I can kind of get), while others think you're actively hindering your intelligence somehow.

On the first point:

I've tried it occasionally to see how it compares to my own skill, and while it produces a functional result, it's always very derivative work to the point where you can find things with the exact same names of other 'public' (but not libre) works, and often isn't the ideal solution to what it targets. So I can see how you can get things out of it, but it never felt really that profound to me.

But for the second... isn't this supposed to be the tool for people to do things they aren't experienced in? If anything, you probably need to be able to understand how to write pertaining to the task so the token probabilities are biased toward writing from that area.

And even then, if all you end up doing is prompting AI, then wouldn't you ultimately serve no purpose outside of being glorified QA?

I guess I'm trying to figure out what exactly non-users would be 'falling behind' in that affects them more than those who use AI?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rothe@piefed.social 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It really cannot. But people who have no knowledge in a field absolutely think LLMs are proficient in that field. As soon as an expert in that field look at what the LLM is doing in their field, that illusion quickly vanishes.

[–] Eq0@literature.cafe 9 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Unfortunately, that’s not true. LLMs have proven new results in mathematics, at extremely high levels, conjectures open since decades.

I am personally very against this use of AI, but let’s be clear on its capacities.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Every one of those mathematical milestones made by AI is followed by an article from a mathematician pointing out the 'discovery' was a flawed rehash or not really applicable to the problem. Same for all the claims about finding bugs, they are old and known bugs and occasionally it can identify already known types of bugs faster as long as a human can filter out the wrong results.

AI does do a fine job of filtering large data sets in controlled environments, like how it is used for finding exoplanets, but just for speeding up an existing process.

It doesn't do anything new.

[–] Eq0@literature.cafe 2 points 1 week ago

A reference with a reasonable overview: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.02859

Look at code security too.

[–] Natanael@infosec.pub 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Eq0@literature.cafe 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah, I had read earlier today. But even the author said that his own draft was LLM-based.

[–] Natanael@infosec.pub 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Assisted, not based. Read through to see the difference

[–] Eq0@literature.cafe 0 points 1 week ago

They write “with a great deal of help”, so I am usure where the boundary between the two lies and where they would find themselves.

[–] bruh@nord.pub 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

names Fremats last theorem proved by Anthropic

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago

They solved the Navier-Stokes milennial problem just the other day.

We can talk about the AI bubble, water consumption and AI "art", but it's undeniably doing some incredible stuff too.

If you can't wrap your head around something that isn't entirely good or entirely bad then well I don't think a discussion can be had with you.