this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2026
77 points (100.0% liked)

Map Enthusiasts

6338 readers
110 users here now

For the map enthused!

Rules:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

So it looks like your bang doesn't go tooo far for your buck even if you live in a LCOL state when you are on minimum wage I guess

Is this useful? What do you think? I honestly don't know, but seen that I already had the data from this discussion, why not plot it?

I tried to find a map with it, but my searching skills seem to have deteriorated (or search engines aren't great nowadays)

Data taken from St. Louis Fed's FRED (Federal Reserve Economic Data) for "Regional Price Parities (RPP): All Items" and "State Minimum Wage Rate"

Latest data available for RPP is 2024, so I used same date for wages. For states with no minimum-wage law or a minimum wage below the federal minimum wage, federal minimum wage was applied like the folks at Economic Policy Institute do

Convertion based on following formula:

real wage = nominal wage * (100 / RPP)

Plotted with ultimaps.com, if anyone has another alternative that shows data + state abbreviation, lmk

What flaws do you see on this map? Where does it fail? I guess metro areas are always complicated and a more granular approach with county data would be more useful, right?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lauha@lemmy.world 14 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

I'm dumb. Is higher better or worse?

[–] livligkinkajou@slrpnk.net 13 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

Higher minimum wage is better, ie:

Alabama and Georgia on paper have the same min federal wage, $7.25, but after maths, you can actually buy more stuff in Alabama than Georgia, so it's like getting paid $8.16 vs $7.53, but you still get less money than if you worked the same hour in Oregon, and get paid $15.43

On paper, minimum wage in California, $16, might be higher than Oregon, $15.95, but you can actually buy less stuff bc costs are higher in both places, but even higher in CA, so after maths, Oregon minimum wage goes down, to $15.43, but it's is still higher than CA, which also went down, to $14.45.

Even if cost of living is higher in Oregon and lower in Alabama, minimum wage in Oregon is still higher

I guess the map is only good at that and it won't tell you much more. And I guess that's why we dont see it lol

Let's say you are a remote worker and get $100/hr, this map doesnt tell you much, but this one is more useful and tells you where you can get more for your money:

edit: idk if above image is showing up, if it isnt, you can find it here

[–] hitstun@feddit.online 6 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Visual Capitalist's infographic titled "The Purchasing Power of $100"; a map of the United States with each state colored in based on how much stuff $100 can actually buy, ranging from $88 in California to $113 in Arkansas

Here you go. The ![alt text](imageURL) format seems to work best on PieFed and most Lemmy clients. Mbin users see a link with the alt text instead.

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 0 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Why does this seem to contradict the OPs map.

[–] hitstun@feddit.online 4 points 4 hours ago

It's because minimum wages are generally higher in states with high cost of living. OP's map does a good job demonstrating that, even though everything is more expensive in New England and the west coast, the minimum wages there are high enough that you can afford it. Unless you're from New Hampshire.

[–] jqubed@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago

I don’t understand what I’m seeing here