Photography

1 readers

1 users here now

A place to politely discuss the tools, technique and culture of photography.

This is not a good place to simply share cool photos/videos or promote your own work and projects, but rather a place to discuss photography as an art and post things that would be of interest to other photographers.

founded 11 months ago

MODERATORS

communick@viewfinder.pro

Job etiquette & conflict of interests (alien.top)

submitted 10 months ago by Omeletteplata@alien.top to c/photography@viewfinder.pro

21 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I recently was hired to shoot for a client who will be participating in a sporting event. Said sporting event also has official photographers by the event organizers, but they are only paid via direct sales to participants, no upfront payment. Taking this job means ill be cutting in potential sales for the official photographers, whom I am also friends and shoot with from time to time.

My question is, is it morally ok for me to take the job in these situations? My client came directly to me even when they could've chosen the official photographers themselves. Should I just honor my clients wishes and go ahead? Looking at the big picture I realize the bigger assholes are the organizers who don't pay their official photographers upfront.

Has anyone been put in similar situations? I'd really appreciate some second thoughts and discussions. Thanks.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] themanlnthesuit@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

If you're paid upfront then go by all means. If this person is aware there are gonna be photographers and will bring their own chances are this person doesn't want to buy what's offered.

Some of the other photographers may get pissed, but business is business. They should get pissed at the organizers or plainly just choose not to participate under those terms, I wouldn't.