this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Photography

1 readers
1 users here now

A place to politely discuss the tools, technique and culture of photography.

This is not a good place to simply share cool photos/videos or promote your own work and projects, but rather a place to discuss photography as an art and post things that would be of interest to other photographers.

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Just curious. I know everybody’s different.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] randomburnerish@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (9 children)

Acting like because it’s shot in film it’s art by default.

[–] _mews@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (4 children)

IG is currently filled with this. Like very bad photos shot on film getting some hype cause it was shot on film. Quite funny

[–] randomburnerish@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Right and like your iPhone is free. People really spent $$ on film, developing and scanning for objectively bad pictures

[–] donnerstag246245@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You have to take a few bad ones in the beginning to start taking good ones.

[–] thegamenerd@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Personally I've started dabbling into film photography because I think the process is neat. I still take my digital camera with me when I take my film camera though as I'd hate to miss the shot while I'm still learning film

I started with digital and I feel that it's been a great way to learn photography because unlike film the turn around for finding out if the pictures look bad is really fast

[–] donnerstag246245@alien.top 1 points 9 months ago

Your second point is true. I’ve only ever shot film and it took a long time for me to be “good” at taking photos. It’s a long process but very rewarding too!

[–] maz-o@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

Reddit is also filled with this.

[–] adidasman23@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That’s just human behavior tho. If something is harder to obtain it gains in value. I don’t think Michelangelo‘s David would be as well known if he had 3D Printed him. Not saying it makes sense, just saying that seems to be how our brain functions.

[–] vivaaprimavera@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

If someone managed to 3D print a thing that big, it would be known just for that.

[–] beanbagbaby13@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

Honestly my pet peeve is people acting like I’m supposed to treat Instagram as a gallery and not as a study.

Who said I thought it was art just because I posted it and it’s film? Why is it “funny” that others in the same hobby enjoy seeing it?

Comments like this honestly just come off as bitter. I feel like you’re in the camp of people who bought a Sony a7iii and then never post anything anywhere and then complain that “photography is dead” or something, despite them choosing not to participate in an active community out of fear of not being seen as an “artist” for 0.001 seconds

[–] notforcommentinohgoo@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] ChrisMartins001@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

So many bad photos on instagram like this. A street photo of the back of some random person just standing there not doing anything interesting, convert it to B/W and it becomes ART!

[–] caizoo@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

Wether even worse or just as bad is film emulation, bad shots on digital but it looks like film so it’s artsy

[–] jiebyjiebs@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

Just because something is subjectively bad doesn't mean it's not art. Art isn't exclusive.

[–] Equivalent-Clock1179@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

Opposite also, because it was shot digital, it's automatically crap.

[–] EvanSchurr@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

Film almost always gives worse results for more effort. I’ve seen a lot of photographers go film and almost immediately their work becomes so bland and pedestrian.

No, your photo of a traffic cone/street lamp/staircase is not interesting because it’s film. It’s boring lol

[–] donjulioanejo@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

I honestly don't get the appeal of film at all. Like, I can barely be bothered to load my photos into lightroom and edit them. Having to go through a bunch of extra steps before you can even look at a photo seems like a nightmare.

Granted, I like two things: taking photos, and having nice photos. I don't like the steps inbetween.

[–] HellbellyUK@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

Isn’t Lomography/Impossible Project’s whole business model based on that?

[–] blucentio@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I think there are a lot of people that learn about editing style or shooting formats, rather than content (subject, emotion, moment, composition, lighting and other in-camera techniques, etc).

And if those fundamentals are weak, it can feel like putting a coat of paint on a crumbling structure. The paint is great if there's a strong foundation, but without it...

[–] randomburnerish@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

Oh yeah that’s exactly what I mean. I love film but it’s not some magic wand that makes every image interesting